Analysis of Probable Risk Factors of Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia in Patients Referred to the Gastroenterology Clinic with Dyspepsia

  1. Leila Mahmoudieh ,
  2. Naghmeh Salarieh ,
  3. Mojgan Forootan ,
  4. Somayeh Fatemizadeh ,
  5. Pardis Ketabi Moghadam

Vol 8 No 2 (2023)

DOI 10.31557/apjcb.2023.8.2.161-168


Background: Gastric intestinal metaplasia is known as a precursor of gastric cancer in the cascade of events from chronic gastritis to gastric adenocarcinoma. Given the risk of developing gastric cancer in patients with gastric intestinal metaplasia, periodic screening of these lesions for early detection of malignant transformation seems logical. Risk factors of these lesions are worth to be searched and modified due to prevalence and mortality rate of gastric cancer in Iranian population.
Material and methods: In this case-control study, 39 patients with and 39 patients without intestinal metaplasia who were attended to the gastroenterology clinic from 2017 to 2021 for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy due to dyspepsia were enrolled. Probable risk factors of gastric intestinal metaplasia were compared between two mentioned groups.
Results: According to the presented study, there was a significant link between Turk race (P-value=0.014), couples (p-value=0.033), smoking (p-value=0.009), cholecystectomy (p-value=0.033), active helicobacter pylori infection (p-value=0.018) and prevalence of gastric intestinal metaplasia. There was also a significant association between consumption of fast food (p-value=0.037) as well as proton-pump-inhibitors (p=value=0.028) and risk of gastric intestinal metaplasia. Blood group A was also statistically related (p-value=0.012) to the gastric intestinal metaplasia.
Conclusion: According to the results, the chance of metaplasia in Turk race, married people, blood group A, people with history of smoking, active helicobacter pylori infection and history of cholecystectomy is shown to be more than other people. Detrimental diets including fast food as well as consumption of proton-pump-inhibitors were detected to be related to gastric intestinal metaplasia. To corroborate the results, the small sample size of the presented study should be supplemented by more studies with more participants.





Gastric cancer as a common cancer worldwide with a low five-year survival [1] is not diagnosed at early stages due to the lack of symptoms. Missed diagnosis at early stages in addition to invasive characteristic of disease itself result in rapid progression of cancer to the end stages of the disease and death [2]. This cancer might be cured if found at initial stages [3]. Approximately,gastric cancer is assigned 14% of all malignancies in men to itself. It is reported that gastric cancer is the most common malignancy in men and the third most common cancer in women. It is also known as the most common cause of cancer related death in Iran [4]. Global statistics also confirm prevalence of gastric cancer as the first and third malignancy in men and women, respectively [5]. It is common in the sixth decade of life, although it has also been detected earlier. This malignancy requires a prompt diagnosis and treatment [6]. Having written about the burden of gastric cancer, the paramount issues are whether we can blame pre-malignant lesions for creating gastric cancer or not, whether we can detect and ablate these lesions before they become malignant or not, and more essential to address if we can detect and omit the culprit risk factors or not? The focus of the present study is to evaluate presence of some of the proposed risk factors for gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) in patients referred to the gastroenterology clinic of Taleghani hospital with dyspepsia. As it is the case, GIM is a key step in the Correa cascade [7] in the pathogenesis of gastric cancer. In this pathway, chronic mucosal inflammation with mixture of polymorphonuclear and mononuclear cells is substituted by scattered or diffuse atrophy of gastric glands and parietal cells leading to formation of metaplastic intestinal epithelium comprising goblet cells. Eventually, dysplastic cells with neoplastic contents (so-called early mucosal cancer) are substituted for gastric atrophy [7]. Triggering etiologies in this cascade are H. pylori infection, autoimmune reaction, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), smoking, high salt intake, and nitrous compounds. When it comes to classification of GIM, histologic evaluation and endoscopic extension of the involved region are of great importance for risk-stratification of the intestinal metaplasia. Histologically complete GIM which is small intestinal type containing goblet cells and brush border is detected at early stages in contrast to the incomplete GIM which is large intestinal type without brush border and without regular goblet cells found in advanced stages [8]. Histologically operative link on gastritis assessment (OLGA) classification is used to assess the extension of gastric atrophy and intestinal metaplasia. With this regard, stage III and IV of OLGA classification represent severe extension of gastric atrophy or GIM and strong probability of transformation to dysplasia and cancer. Stage III and IV of OLGA classification are considered for patients with severe atrophy of antrum and incisura angularis regardless of presence of corpus atrophy as well as patients with moderate or severe atrophy of corpus following at least moderate atrophy of antrum and incisura angularis. GIM in patients with high-risk variables suggestive of progression of disease including incomplete GIM, OLGA III or IV, history of gastric cancer in first degree relatives, and residents or immigrants of areas with high prevalence of gastric cancer is considered for triennial endoscopic surveillance [9]. To evaluate OLGA classification, gastric topographic biopsy mapping is required. Resultantly, patients with GIM in a random biopsy from stomach are advised to repeat endoscopy with targeted and nontargeted biopsies in 1 year. Intestinal metaplasia is a contributing factor of gastric cancer [10,11] requiring an intermittent screening for gastric cancer [12]. Gastric carcinoma would be detected at the location of intestinal metaplasia. Since gastric cancer is related to the severity and extension of intestinal metaplasia, recognition of risk factors of intestinal metaplasia as well as early diagnosis and optimal follow-up of patients with intestinal metaplasia may be a good approach to reduce the mortality and imposed burden of gastric cancer [13-16]. The pattern of prevalence of gastric cancer shows a high prevalence of gastric cancer in rural areas, Asia, and Iran in contrast to the other parts of the western societies. This is might be due to the geographical, racial and environmental factors [4]. In the present study, we have attempted to evaluate the risk factors of intestinal metaplasia in patients referred to gastroenterology clinic of Taleghani hospital, a tertiary center in Tehran, Iran with dyspepsia from 2017 to 2021.

Materials and Methods

This is a case-control study on 78 consecutive patients attending to gastroenterology clinic from 2017 to 2021 including 39 patients with and 39 subjects without intestinal metaplasia according to the pathologic reports of gastric endoscopic samples. Patients with reported complete or incomplete GIM (OLGA I, II, III and IV) who were older than 18 after a written informed consent regardless of status of H. pylori infection were included in the study and were sent to the case group. Patients with reported GIM but without gastric topographic mapping biopsy were sent for re-endoscopy and standard mapping biopsy and then entered the study. Due to the prevalence of H. pylori infection in the area, all of the patients in the case group were advised to receive H. pylori eradication regimen and check for H. pylori eradication in an appropriate time after cessation of drugs. Additionally, patients in the case group were suggested to have a surveillance endoscopy in 3 years due to the fact that gastric cancer is still rising in our country despite its global downward trend. Patients older than 18 with dyspepsia and endoscopic random biopsies negative for GIM (OLGA 0) were sent to the control arm. Patients younger than 18, patients with previous personal history of gastric cancer, previously treated for H. pylori infection, belonging to the genetic syndromes which increase the probability of gastric cancer, patients without gastric topographic mapping, and patients not assigning the written informed consent were excluded from study. Biopsies were taken from at least six zones of stomach including lesser curvature of body and antrum, greater curvature of body and antrum, and incisura angularis. The study was approved by the ethical code of IR.SBMU.MSP. REC.1397.227 in ethic committee approval of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Studied variables were age, ethnicity, marital status, job, literacy, smoking, alcohol use, substance use, previous medical history, poor dietary habits, past drug history, blood group, and anthropometric measurements. The referred patients to the center were all Iranians but from different ethnicities including Turks (Turkish race constitutes the largest minority in Iran commonly living in Iranian Azerbaijan although they also live scattered all over Iran. Their first language is Turkish.), Farses or Persians (They are the largest group of Iranians. Their first language is Persian. They live in major cities of Iran including Tehran, Isfahan, Fars,… as well as smaller cities), and Arabs (They are the Arab inhabitants of Iran, commonly living in Khuzestan. Their mother language is Arabic.) Poor dietary habits were assessed using questionnaires that evaluated frequency of consumption of food which are low in nutrients including vitamins, minerals, and fiber and high in calory, saturated fat, refined sugar, salt, and preservatives. Resultantly, consumption of fast food which is high in fat and carbohydrates, consumption of pickles which are high in sodium due to process of brining, eating food with preservatives, and adding salt to food after cooking were assessed during the last 3 years. High-school certificate was considered as cutoff for having academic literacy. Former smokers (≥100 cigarettes in lifetime) and current smokers, both were considered smoker in this study. In terms of alcohol consumption, alcohol intake more than 7 drinks per week for women and more than 14 drinks per week for men was considered significant. in this study. In the present study, substance abuse is defined as usage of illicit drugs including opium, amphetamines, etc. excluding cigarette and alcohol. In terms of anthropometric measurements, BMI of participants was evaluated and compared between cases and controls. Past medical and past surgical history of participants were collected for Cholecystectomy, gastrointestinal and non-gastrointestinal malignancies, autoimmune diseases, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, renal disease, and H. pylori infection. All the mentioned variables were compared across the groups.

Statistical analysis

Data analysis was performed by IBM SPSS version 24.0, Chicago, IL. Mean and standard deviations were assessed for numerical variables. Frequency and percentage were determined for categorical variables. Chi-square (for frequencies ≥ 5) and fissure exact tests (for frequencies less than 5) were used to determine whether or not there is a significant association between categorical variables with a significance level of 0.05 and confidence interval of 95%.


Demographic analysis of patients revealed that population’s characteristics were not significantly different between two groups of present study except for race. As we can see in Table 1, mean age of total participants was 51.2 ± 13.7 ranging from 21-84 years without significant difference (49.9 ± 13.6 for controls versus 52.5 ± 13.9 for cases, P=0.417). 30.8% and 43.6% of participants were male in cases and controls, respectively without significant difference (P=0.24). The percentage of married participants was 92.3% for cases vs 74.4% for controls which was statistically different between two groups (P=0.033).

Table 1. Demographic Characteristics.

Demographic characteristic Control (n=39) Case (n=39) P-value
Female n (%) 22 (56.4) 27 (69.2) 0.24
Male n (%) 17 (43.6) 12 (30.8)
Age Mean (±SD) 49.9 (± 13.6) 52.5 (± 13.9) 0.417
BMI Mean (±SD) 24.96 (± 3.4) 28.95 (± 2.3) 0.276
Marital status
Married n (%) 29 (74.4) 36 (92.3)
Single n (%) 10 (25.6) 3 (7.7) 0.033
Academic literacy n (%) 19 (48.72) 18 (46.15)
Employment status 0.821
Employees n (%) 15 (25.6) 13 (7.7)
Unemployed n (%) 24 (48.72) 26 (46.15) 0.368
Fars 22 (56.4) 10 (25.6)
Turk 10 (25.6) 21 (53.8) 0.014
Arab 7 (18) 8 (20.5)

Races were Fars, Turk, and Arab in 56.4%, 25.6%, and 18%, respectively in control group and 25.6%, 53.8%, and 20.5%, respectively in case group showing significant difference (P=0.014). Farses were significantly dominant in patients without GIM and Turks were dominant in case group. Academic literacy was found in 19 and 18 subjects of control and case groups, respectively without significant difference (P=0.821). Employment status as well as academic literacy was not found to be related to the GIM in this study (P=0.368). The mean BMI was 24.96 ± 3.4 and 28.95 ± 2.3 kg/m² in controls and cases, respectively without significant difference (P=0.276). History of illicit drug use between two groups was not meaningfully different except for smoking. As can be driven from Table 2, a total of 38.5% and 12.8% of controls and cases were smokers (P=0.009), 20.5% and 10.25% of controls and cases were alcohol users (P=0.074), and only one patient in each group was substance user (P=1.000).

Table 2. History of Illicit Drugs.

History of illicit drugs Control (n=39) Case (n=39) P-value
Smoking n (%) 5 (12.8) 15 (38.5) 0.009
Alcohol use n (%) 8 (20.5) 4 (10.25) 0.21
Substance use n (%) 1 (2.6) 1 (2.6) 1

Alcohol intake more than 7 drinks per week for women and more than 14 drinks per week for men was considered significant. Given the past medical history of participants in Table 3, a significant difference was found in history of cholecystectomy between cases and controls.

Table 3. Past Medical History and H. pylori Status.

Past medical history Control (n=39) Case (n=39) P-value
Cholecystectomy n (%) 3 (7.7) 10 (25.6) 0.033
Gastrointestinal n (%) 0 (0) 2 (5.13) 0.891
Non-gastrointestinal n (%) 0 (0) 3 (7.7)
Autoimmune diseases n (%) 7 (17.9) 11 (28.2) 0.28
Diabetes mellitus n (%) 8 (20.5) 9 (23.07) 0.783
Hypertension n (%) 7 (17.9) 8 (20.5) 0.773
Renal diseases n (%) 4 (10.2) 2 (5.13) 0.395
H. pylori infection n (%) 9 (23.07) 19 (48.72) 0.018

3 of controls and 10 of cases had previous cholecystectomy (P=0.033). History of malignancy was reported in 12.8% of cases (2 gastrointestinal and 3 non- gastrointestinal) versus none of the participants of control group (P=0.891). History of autoimmune diseases was positive for 18 members including 2 cases of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and 5 cases of lupus in control group and 1 case of lupus and 10 cases of RA in case group (P=0.28). Active H. Pylori infection was seen in 9 participants of control group and 19 participants of case group. As could be seen in Table 3, active H. pylori infection was significantly associated with GIM (P=0.018). There was no meaningful difference between cases and controls for diabetes mellitus (P=0.314), hypertension (P=0.555) and renal disorders (P=0.247). Comparison of percentage of participants who had poor dietary habits among cases and controls revealed that unhealthy diet might be an indicator of the probability of GIM especially following with high fast-food intake. As shown in Table 4, consumption of fast food was statistically higher in case group (P=0.037).

Table 4. History of Dietary Pattern and Food Habits.

Past medical history Control (n=39) Case (n=39) P-value
Fast food n (%)
No consumption 13 (33.33) 5 (5.13) 0.037
Monthly or less 22 (56.41) 21 (53.84)
Weekly 4 (10.26) 11 (28.20)
Daily 0 (0) 2 (5.13)
Food with preservatives n (%)
No consumption 12 (30.77) 15 (38.5) 0.078
Monthly or less 23 (58.97) 14 (35.9)
Weekly 4 (10.26) 10 (25.6)
Daily 0 (%) 0 (%)
Pickles n (%)
No consumption 7 (17.9) 11 (28.2) 0.751
Monthly or less 18 (46.15) 15 (38.5)
Weekly 11 (28.21) 10 (25.6)
Daily 3 (7.7) 3 (7.7)
Salt n (%)
Without salt 7 (17.9) 0 (0) 0.081
Salt consumption only during cooking 20 (51.3) 25 (64.1)
Salt consumption during cooking and eating 12 (30.77) 14 (35.9)

Statistics did not show any difference for consumption of salt (p-value=0.081), pickles (P=0.751) and preservatives (P=0.078). As reflected in Table 5, percentage of variety of blood groups in cases and controls was significantly different (P=0.015).

Table 5. Variety of Blood Groups among Participants.

Variety of blood groups Control (n=39) Case (n=39) P-value
A Rh+ n (%) 5 (56.4) 16 (69.2) 0.012
Rh- n (%) 3 (43.6) 3 (30.8)
B Rh+ n (%) 4 (%) 4 (%)
Rh- n (%) 1 (%) 0 (%)
AB Rh+ n (%) 4 (%) 1 (%)
Rh- n (%) 7 (%) 1 (%)
O Rh+ n (%) 11 (%) 14 (%)
Rh- n (%) 4 (%) 0 (%)

Accordingly, A+ was the most common blood group among patients with GIM. Evaluation of past drug history of participants via chi-square test of independence determined that there is an association between consumption of PPI and presence of GIM (P=0.016). The results are shown in Table 6.

Table 6. Past Drug History.

Past drug history Control (n=39) Case (n=39) P-value
PPIs n (%) 10 (25.6) 23 (58.97) 0.028
H2 blockers n (%) 5 (12.82) 5 (12.82) 1
NSAIDs n (%) 1 (2.6) 0 (0) 0.5

The serum level of micronutrients was measured for zinc, vitamin B, and vitamin D which were normal for 19, 37, and 19 participants of control group and 17, 30, and 23 members of case group, respectively without any difference (P > 0.05).


GIM is a known risk factor of gastric cancer and detection of modifiable risk factors for GIM can help decrease the number of gastric cancers related to. As could be driven from the results, mean age of participants totally was 51.22 ± 13.7 years and there was not any significant difference between mean age of cases and controls. Majority of subjects in both groups of cases and controls were female, but this dominancy was not statistically significant. These results are in contrast to the studies that introduce male gender and old age as important factors of GIM [17,18]. This discrepancy needs more studies with larger sample sizes to be corroborated. H. pylori infection is known to be a major risk factor of gastric intestinal metaplasia as seen in the present study, too [19]. A large study on 28745 patients since 2008 to 2013 revealed a significant association between intestinal metaplasia and H. Pylori infection [20]. Intestinal metaplasia recognition as well as gastric cancer is seen in low proportion of patients with H. Pylori infection. It shows the probability of other environmental and genetic factors involved in presence and progression of metaplasia into the gastric cancer [20,21]. Generally, chronic active gastritis is the result H. pylori infection in all patients with active H. pylori infection. Of them, only about 10% progress to severe atrophic gastritis [22]. Male gender, positive history for gastric cancer in first-degree relatives, old age, patient’s polymorphism for IL1B, and genotype Vac A of H. pylori are also known as contributing factors in progression of H. pylori infection and chronic active gastritis to gastric cancer [23-25]. Association between smoking and intestinal metaplasia has been assessed in different studies and an increased risk of gastric cancer has been confirmed among smokers [26]. The results for association of smoking and GIM are somehow controversial since it is not clear if detrimental effects of cigarette smoking is due to progression of GIM to neoplastic tissue or formation of GIM itself. In the present study, a significant association was found between smoking and GIM. Studies are also emphasizing on the current smokers or former smokers with quitting smoking for no more than 15 years [27]. Current smokers and former smokers had not been separated in the present study necessitating more studies in this group of patients with special attention to the nuances of the time and amount of smoking. The mentioned association was not found for other illicit drugs in this study. A chi-square of independence revealed significant association between some poor nutritional habits and GIM. Fast food consumption is shown to be significantly related to intestinal metaplasia in the present study. This is in line with study of Tan et al that shows a strong relation between high-calory/high- carbohydrate diet and GIM [28]. This association was not found for pickles, high salt diet and processed food. Study of Taborda et al also shows that high consumption of food and vegetables can decrease the risk of GIM. Same as the results of our study, survey of Taborda et al did not find any effect for high-salt intake in contrast to the majority of studies in the literature that introduce high salt intake as triggering factor for GIM. These conflicting results need more attention and evaluations [29]. The study of Oh et al [30] on 448 first-degree relatives of patients with gastrointestinal cancers similarly reported a significant difference in consumption of high salt intake and GIM (P=0.047, OR=1.52). Per the revised literature, contradictory results are obtained for the role of salt intake, unhealthy food, low intake of fruits and vegetables in intestinal metaplasia [30-32]. Further studies are required to approve a special regimen for prevention of gastric intestinal metaplasia at least for high-risk patients. Inappropriate dietary habits, use of fast food, coffee, low physical activity and sleep disorders would result in peptic ulcer disease, intestinal metaplasia, and gastric cancer [19,33-35]. Based on chi-square of independence, current study shows that metaplasia probability was not related to employment status of participants, but there are large number of different studies that show gastric cancer is related to low socioeconomic status maybe due to exposure to the poor dietary habit and harmful environmental contacts. In this regard, high percentage of gastric intestinal metaplasia in farmers is indicative of association between gastric intestinal metaplasia and soil nitrate, food preservation without refrigerator, and lack of health facilities in rural regions [36]. Studies evaluating the relation between racial/ethnic diversity and GIM are not rich. Study of Nguyen et al shows that Hispanic and African-Americans in the USA are more prone to the GIM in comparison with other races in the USA [37]. Our study showed a higher trend for GIM in Turkish participants. The results attributed to the race and ethnicity should be interpreted with caution due to the presence of a large number of confounding factors including the effect of immigration, special dietary habit in each ethnicity, different prevalence of H. pylori infection in various ethnicities, different health infrastructures for different ethnicities, etc. So, the results are not only due to different genetic background of each ethnicity. Study of Ayvaz et al shows higher incidence of GIM in Afghans than Turkish population [38]. Study of Olmez et al on Turkish population revealed that gastric cancer is a health problem in Van. The prevalence of GIM and associated risk factors were evaluated in this study. H. pylori infection in this group of patients was known as a contributing factor for prevalence of GIM and gastric cancer in Turkish people living in Van. It is felt that prevalence of GIM in Turkish people should be assessed after adjusting confounding factors like H. pylori infection [39]. This study is in contrast with other studies which suggest the proportion of GIM would be lower due to better mental and emotional status of couples [40]. Majority of participants in two groups were married especially in case group. The chi- square test of independence revealed that marital status and being married are significantly related to GIM. Sun et al evaluated the effect of sociodemographic disparities on gastric cancer and GIM. Based on their study, sex and age were introduced as effective variables on prevalence of gastric cancer and GIM in Chinese population. However, they postulated that low socioeconomic status and low educational level can be evaluated as risk factors of neoplastic and preneoplastic lesions [41]. Marital status as a factor related to the socioeconomic and emotional status of participants should be interpreted with caution. The chi-square test of independence showed that there is a strong relationship between chance of metaplasia and history of some diseases. As could be driven from the results, participants with cholecystectomy and history of active H. pylori infection are more likely to have GIM. These results are in line with other studies around the world [42,43]. Cholecystectomy is known as risk factor for some gastrointestinal cancers including gastric cancer. It may be in part due to excess gastroduodenal reflux after cholecystectomy and changes in gastrointestinal microbiota [44]. One of the limitations of the present study is its small sample size in 2 arms of study which can impact on the effect size and power of study. Further studies with larger sample sizes and in wider geographical areas should be carried out if we wanted to rely on the results and suggest a programmed endoscopic surveillance for patients with non-modifiable risk factors of GIM. Also, long-term interventional studies with focus on the reduction of modifiable risk factors for GIM and gastric cancer should be designed to recommend a strict preventive strategy for patients at risk for gastric cancer and GIM based on the present study as well as first degree relatives of patients with gastric cancer [45]. So, the results should be interpreted with caution since the sample size is small. However, the results would be a valuable clue for further studies.

In conclusion, according to the results, the chance of metaplasia would be more in Turks, couples, participants with history of cholecystectomy, active H. pylori infection, consumption of fast food, people with O blood group, consumption of PPIs. As a result, modification of some detrimental diets, early diagnosis and eradication of H. pylori infection for people at risk for gastric cancer seems to be logical. Further studies in this field can be a complement to the present study and can help better interpretation of the reported results.


This study has been designed and managed under supervision of medical faculty of Shahid Beheshti university and all expenses were supposed to be provided by research institute budget of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. We show our sincere appreciation to the staff of gastroenterology and liver diseases research institute of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences for their cooperation in preparation of required information in this study.

List of abbreviations

BMI: Body Mass Index, EBV: Epstein-Barr virus, GIM: Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia, H. Pylori: Helicobacter Pylori, OLGA: Operative Link on Gastritis Assessment.

Statements & Declarations Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Competing interests

There was no conflict of interests.

Author contributions

LM, Follow up of the patients, Critical review, Basic concept; MF, Follow up of the patients, Preparing data, Basic concept; NS, Writing the manuscript, Preparing data; SF, Writing the manuscript, Preparing data; PKM, Corresponding author, Writing manuscript, Finial edition

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethics approval

The study was approved by the ethical code of IR.SBMU.MSP.REC.1397.227 in ethic committee approval of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent to publish

The authors affirm that human research participants provided informed consent for publication.


  1. Gastric cancer: Worldwide burden and prevention opportunities Winawer SJ . Chinese Journal of Digestive Diseases.2005;6(3). CrossRef
  2. Comparison of the type of intera-cellular mucin in patients with H. pylori gastritis and normal population Sotoudeh , Mirsamadi MM MM, Sedghi . Tehran Uni Med J.2002;29:245.
  3. Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine. 18th edition. McGraw-Hill Fauci AS , braumwald E, Kasper DL , et al . 2012.
  4. Gastric Cancer in Iran: An Overview of Risk Factors and Preventive Measures Akbarpour E, Sadjadi A, Derakhshan MH , Roshandel G, Alimohammadian M. Archives of Iranian Medicine.2021;24(7). CrossRef
  5. Salamatiran, Iranian Information Comprehensive Health Center. The most cancers in Iran, available from: http://www.iransalamat. com/index.php file=art &operation=show&id=8625&subsectionId=338. .
  6. Global burden of cancers attributable to infections in 2008: a review and synthetic analysis Martel C, Ferlay J, Franceschi S, Vignat J, Bray F, Forman D, Plummer M. The Lancet. Oncology.2012;13(6). CrossRef
  7. Diagnosis and Management of Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia: Current Status and Future Directions Huang RJ , Choi AY , Truong CD , Yeh MM , Hwang JH . Gut and Liver.2019;13(6). CrossRef
  8. Histologic Subtyping of Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia: Overview and Considerations for Clinical Practice Shah SC , Gawron AJ , Mustafa RA , Piazuelo MB . Gastroenterology.2020;158(3). CrossRef
  9. Gastritis staging in clinical practice: the OLGA staging system Rugge M, Meggio A, Pennelli G, Piscioli F, Giacomelli L, De Pretis G, Graham DY . Gut.2007;56(5). CrossRef
  10. Operative link for gastritis assessment vs operative link on intestinal metaplasia assessment Rugge M, Fassan M, Pizzi M, Farinati F, Sturniolo GC , Plebani M, Graham DY . World Journal of Gastroenterology.2011;17(41). CrossRef
  11. Gastric intestinal metaplasia and early gastric cancer in the west: a changing paradigm Gomez JM , Wang AY . Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2014;10(6).
  12. Gastric cancer: prevention, screening and early diagnosis Pasechnikov V, Chukov S, Fedorov E, Kikuste I, Leja M. World Journal of Gastroenterology.2014;20(38). CrossRef
  13. Diagnosis and management of high risk group for gastric cancer Yoon H, Kim N. Gut and Liver.2015;9(1). CrossRef
  14. Outcome of intestinal metaplasia in gastric biopsy of patients with dyspepsia in Guilan Province, North Iran Mansour-Ghanaei F, Joukar F, Soati F, Mansour-Ghanaei A, Atrkar-Roushan Z. Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention: APJCP.2013;14(6). CrossRef
  15. Management of precancerous conditions and lesions in the stomach (MAPS): guideline from the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), European Helicobacter Study Group (EHSG), European Society of Pathology (ESP), and the Sociedade Portuguesa de Endoscopia Digestiva (SPED) Dinis-Ribeiro M, Areia M, Vries AC , Marcos-Pinto R, Monteiro-Soares M, O'Connor A, Pereira C, et al . Endoscopy.2012;44(1). CrossRef
  16. Prevalence of gastric precancerous lesions among chronic dyspeptic patients and related common risk factors Ajdarkosh H, Sohrabi M, Moradniani M, Rakhshani N, Sotodeh M, Hemmasi G, Khoonsari M, Ameli M, Malekzadeh R, Zamani F. European journal of cancer prevention: the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP).2015;24(5). CrossRef
  17. Association between family history and gastric carcinoma among young adults Kikuchi S, Nakajima T, Nishi T, Kobayashi O, Konishi T, Inaba Y, Wada O, et al . Japanese Journal of Cancer Research: Gann.1996;87(4). CrossRef
  18. Risk factors for the gastric cancer: a case-control study in Tibet Li K, Zhang YL , Dan Z, Zhaxi CM , Nie J. Digestive and Liver Disease: Official Journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver.2009;41(1). CrossRef
  19. Histologic intestinal metaplasia and endoscopic atrophy are predictors of gastric cancer development after Helicobacter pylori eradication Shichijo S, Hirata Y, Niikura R, Hayakawa Y, Yamada A, Ushiku T, Fukayama M, Koike K. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2016;84(4). CrossRef
  20. Helicobacter pylori infection and the development of gastric cancer Uemura N, Okamoto S, Yamamoto S, Matsumura N, Yamaguchi S, Yamakido M, Taniyama K, Sasaki N, Schlemper RJ . The New England Journal of Medicine.2001;345(11). CrossRef
  21. Factors predicting progression of gastric intestinal metaplasia: results of a randomised trial on Helicobacter pylori eradication Leung WK , Lin SR , Ching JYL , To KF , Ng EKW , Chan FKL , Lau JYW , Sung JJY . Gut.2004;53(9). CrossRef
  22. Preneoplastic conditions in the stomach: always a point of no return? Venerito M, Malfertheiner P. Digestive Diseases (Basel, Switzerland).2015;33(1). CrossRef
  23. A national study of Helicobactor pylori infection in gastric biopsy specimens Sonnenberg A, Lash RH , Genta RM . Gastroenterology.2010;139(6). CrossRef
  24. Risk factors associated with the development of intestinal metaplasia in first-degree relatives of gastric cancer patients Leung WK , Ng EKW , Chan WY , Auyeung ACM , Chan KF , Lam CCH , Chan FKL , Lau JYW , Sung JJY . Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention: A Publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, Cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.2005;14(12). CrossRef
  25. H. pylori genotypes and cytokine gene polymorphisms influence the development of gastric intestinal metaplasia in a Chinese population Leung WK , Chan MCW , To KF , Man EPS , Ng EKW , Chu ESH , Lau JYW , Lin S, Sung JJY . The American Journal of Gastroenterology.2006;101(4). CrossRef
  26. Risk factors of atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia in first-degree relatives of gastric cancer patients compared with age-sex matched controls Oh S, Kim N, Yoon H, Choi YJ , Lee JY , Park KJ , Kim HJ , et al . Journal of Cancer Prevention.2013;18(2). CrossRef
  27. Associations of Duration, Intensity, and Quantity of Smoking With Risk of Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia Thrift AP , Jove AG , Liu Y, Tan MC , El-Serag HB . Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.2022;56(1). CrossRef
  28. Dietary Factors and Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia Risk Among US Veterans Tan MC , Mallepally N, Ho Q, Liu Y, El-Serag HB , Thrift AP . Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2021;66(5). CrossRef
  29. Alimentary factors in the development of gastric intestinal metaplasia in functional dyspeptic patients Taborda AG , Prolla JC . Arquivos De Gastroenterologia.2012;49(3). CrossRef
  30. Effect of cigarette smoking on extent of acid-secreting area and intestinal metaplasia in the stomach Tatsuta M, Iishi H, Okuda S. Digestive Diseases and Sciences.1988;33(1). CrossRef
  31. Effect of Helicobacter pylori infection, smoking and dietary habits on the occurrence of antrum intestinal metaplasia. Clinico-epidemiological study in Poland Jedrychowski W, Popiela T, Drews M, Gabryelewicz A, Marlicz K, Misiunia P, Wajda Z, et al . Polish Journal of Pathology: Official Journal of the Polish Society of Pathologists.1999;50(4).
  32. Effect of lifestyle, smoking, and diet on development of intestinal metaplasia in H. pylori-positive subjects Russo A, Maconi G, Spinelli P, Felice GD , Eboli M, Andreola S, Ravagnani F, et al . The American Journal of Gastroenterology.2001;96(5). CrossRef
  33. ECP-EURONUT-Intestinal Metaplasia Study: urinary and gastric juice analyses European journal of cancer prevention: the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP).1994;3(5).
  34. Prevalence of gastric precancerous lesions in Ardabil, a high incidence province for gastric adenocarcinoma in the northwest of Iran Malekzadeh R, Sotoudeh M, Derakhshan MH , Mikaeli J, Yazdanbod A, Merat S, Yoonessi A, et al . Journal of Clinical Pathology.2004;57(1). CrossRef
  35. Serum micronutrients in relation to pre-cancerous gastric lesions Zhang L, Blot WJ , You WC , Chang YS , Liu XQ , Kneller RW , Zhao L, et al . International Journal of Cancer.1994;56(5). CrossRef
  36. Intestinal metaplasia in Japan: association with diet Nomura A, Yamakawa H, Ishidate T, Kamiyama S, Masuda H, Stemmermann GN , Heilburn LK , Hankin JH . Journal of the National Cancer Institute.1982;68(3).
  37. Prevalence of Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia in a Multiethnic US Veterans Population Nguyen TH , Tan MC , Liu Y, Rugge M, Thrift AP , El-Serag HB . Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology: The Official Clinical Practice Journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.2021;19(2). CrossRef
  38. Comparison of the gastric biopsy results of Afghan refugees and Turkish people Ayvaz , Yakarisik M, Dulger , Ekmen N. J Exp Clin Med.2022;39(1):97-100. CrossRef
  39. The Prevalence of Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia and Distribution of Helicobacter pylori Infection, Atrophy, Dysplasia, and Cancer in Its Subtypes Olmez S, Aslan M, Erten R, Sayar S, Bayram I. Gastroenterology Research and Practice.2015;2015. CrossRef
  40. A Study on Lifestyle Habits and Gastric Cancer in Guilan Province Koohsari MR . Journal of Guilan University of Medical Sciences.2004;13(49).
  41. Sociodemographic disparities in gastric cancer and the gastric precancerous cascade: A population-based study Sun D, Lei L, Xia C, Li H, Cao M, He S, Zhang Z, Guo G, Song G, Peng J, Chen W. The Lancet Regional Health. Western Pacific.2022;23. CrossRef
  42. Does marriage have positive effects on the psychological well-being of the individual? Gove WR , Hughes M, Style CB . Journal of Health and Social Behavior.1983;24(2).
  43. Gastric cancer risk in patients with premalignant gastric lesions: a nationwide cohort study in the Netherlands Vries AC , Grieken NCT , Looman CWN , Casparie MK , Vries E, Meijer EA , Kuipers EJ . Gastroenterology.2008;134(4). CrossRef
  44. Association Between Cholecystectomy and Gastric Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Yang Y, Liu M, Li Y. Frontiers in Oncology.2022;12. CrossRef
  45. Prevalence of Gastric Preneoplastic Lesions in First-Degree Relatives of Patients with Gastric Cancer: a Cross-Sectional Study Sotelo S, Manterola C, Otzen T, Morales E, Castillo I. Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer.2022. CrossRef


© Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Biology , 2023

Author Details

Leila Mahmoudieh
Taleghani Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Naghmeh Salarieh
Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Mojgan Forootan
Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Somayeh Fatemizadeh
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Pardis Ketabi Moghadam
Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical sciences, Tehran, Iran

How to Cite

Mahmoudieh L, Salarieh N, Forootan M, Fatemizadeh S, Ketabi Moghadam P. Analysis of Probable Risk Factors of Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia in Patients Referred to the Gastroenterology Clinic with Dyspepsia. apjcb [Internet]. 21Aug.2023 [cited 27Sep.2023];8(2):161-8. Available from:



  • Abstract viewed - 101 times
  • PDF (FULL TEXT) downloaded - 69 times
  • XML downloaded - 9 times