EGFR and HER2neu Expression in Gall Bladder Carcinoma and Its Association with Clinicopathological Parameters - An Institutional Experience from North India

  1. Inara Abeer ,
  2. Sabina Khan ,
  3. Mohd. Jaseem Hasan ,
  4. Musharraf Hussain

Vol 6 No 1 (2021)

DOI 10.31557/apjcb.2021.6.1.57-65

Abstract

Objective: Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is the most common biliary tract malignancy found worldwide with very high incidence in North India especially Delhi region. It is characterized by poor prognosis and ineffective treatment especially in advanced stage. The aim of this study was to evaluate EGFR and HER2/neu immunoexpression in cancer patients and to correlate it with the clinicopathological parameters so as to identify GBC patients who can benefit from targeted therapy.
Methods: Present study was conducted in the Department of Pathology, Hamdard Institute of Medical Sciences & Research, New Delhi. A total of 40 cases of Gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) were evaluated for Immunohistochemical expression of EGFR and HER2/neu. Clinicopathological parameters of GBC were studied and correlated with immunoexpression of EGFR and HER2 /neu.
Result: The mean age of the GBC patients was 55.9 years with 90% being females. On histopathology, 34(85%) cases were conventional adenocarcinoma. The EGFR expression was positive in 29/40 cases (72.5%). It was significantly more positive in poorly differentiated grade and advanced stages of gall bladder carcinoma (P<0.05). The expression of HER2/neu was positive in 13/40 cases (32.5%). It was significantly more positive in well differentiated gall bladder carcinoma (P<0.05). Immunoexpression of EGFR was inversely related with HER2/neu expression and this association was statistically significant.
Conclusion: Among GBC patients, EGFR expression and HER2/neu expression was 72.5% and 32.5%, respectively. Significant EGFR expression was seen in poorly differentiated and advanced stage cancers while significant HER2/neu expression was seen in well differentiated gall bladder carcinomas. To conclude, these two markers HER2/neu and EGFR can be used as predictive and prognostic markers respectively, with rationale to further explore the use of anti-HER2 and anti- EGFR therapy in gall bladder cancer.

Introduction

Gallbladder cancer is the most common and highly lethal malignancy of the biliary tract worldwide. A very high incidence of this cancer is reported from North India, Chile, Japan and Korea roughly correlating with higher incidence of cholelithiasis in these regions [1]. Relatively lower incidence levels are seen in many western countries. [2]. The worldwide occurrence of gallbladder cancer is less than 2/100000 individuals, but this has been recorded with extensive variance [3].

GBC is linked to various genetic factors, chronic infection of gallbladder or/and environmental exposure to specific chemicals, heavy metals, and many dietary factors [1]. It shows non-specific symptoms, as a result diagnosis is often missed or delayed. It also has the shortest median survival time from the time of diagnosis. This poor prognosis is due to an aggressive biological behaviour and lack of selective screening tests for early detection resulting in delayed diagnosis at advanced stage.

Surgery is the only curative therapy for gallbladder cancer. However, at diagnosis, less than 10% of the patients are candidate for curative surgery [4]. The role of adjuvant therapy in GBC is not well defined. Systemic chemotherapy has shown modest survival benefit in the management of advanced gallbladder cancer. However, available cytotoxic drugs have poor response rate.

Currently, targeted therapy has limited role in the management of gallbladder cancer. Common mutations reported in gallbladder cancer are KRAS, EGFR, BRAF and ERBB2/HER2-neu [5]. Early data suggests possible benefit from blockade of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) by the oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor erlotinib or anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody cetuximab. [6]. The role of HER2/neu expression in gallbladder cancer and targeting this receptor in the management of gallbladder cancer has also been an area of recent research. There are very few reports in the literature especially in the Indian context regarding EGFR and HER2/neu expression in gallbladder carcinoma (GBC). Thus, our study aims to explore the immunohistochemical expression of EGFR and HER2/neu in gallbladder cancer patients and its correlation with clinicopathological parameters so as to identify their role as potential molecular targets for diagnosis and treatment of GBC.

Materials and Methods

The present cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Pathology, Hamdard Institute of Medical Science and Research Hakeem Abdul Hameed Centenary Hospital, New Delhi from June 2017 to August 2019. Ethical clearance was taken from the Institutional Ethics Committee.

A total of 40 cases of histopathologically diagnosed Gallbladder carcinoma were included in the study. Patients with any other associated malignancy or with prior treatment in any form (surgery/radiotherapy/ chemotherapy) were excluded.

The resected cholecystectomy specimens were fixed in 10% buffered formalin and tissue-embedded paraffin blocks prepared using routine procedures. Haematoxylin– eosin staining was done and various histopathological parameters were evaluated. Staging of Gall bladder carcinoma was done according to the TNM staging system for carcinomas of the gallbladder of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and the International Union Against Cancer (UICC) (AJCC/UICC TNM, 7th edition) [7].

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for EGFR (Anti-human EGFR rabbit monoclonal antibody, clone EP22, Master Diagnostica, Spain) and HER2/neu (Anti-cERBB2 rabbit monoclonal antibody, clone SP3, Master Diagnostica, Spain) was performed according to the following procedure:

IHC Procedure

Four to five-micron thick paraffin sections were taken on poly-l-lysine coated slides. Following deparaffinization, slides were placed in citrate buffer and antigen retrieval done by heat method. After washing with distilled water for one to two minutes, followed by tris buffer for one minute, Peroxidase blocking was done using hydrogen peroxide for fifteen minutes.

Slides were then incubated with Primary antibody i.e. EGFR and HER2/neu respectively. Primary antibody was put on the slides one by one and kept for 30 minutes each. Slides washed with Tris buffer again for one to two minutes. Slides were incubated with Secondary antibody (HRP-conjugate) for another thirty minutes followed by washing with buffer for one to two minutes. These slides were incubated in freshly prepared chromogen DAB (3, 3’-diaminobenzidine tetra hydrochloride) for five minutes and stopped with tap water. Slides were counterstained with Harris Haematoxylin followed by washing and air dried. Then the slides were mounted with DPX.

Immunohistochemical evaluation

Cell membrane staining was used to assess positivity for both the markers. HER2/neu and EGFR positivity was defined according to the CAP/ASCO (College of American Pathologists/American Society of Clinical Oncology) criteria for breast cancer, given their wide acceptance in scientific literature.

Immuno-staining classification was based on staining intensity & percentage of stained cells [8].

Interpretation and immuno-scoring

We divided the IHC reporting into 4 grades as follows: IHC 0: No staining is observed or Membrane staining that is incomplete and is faint/barely perceptible and within ≤ 10% of tumour cells.

IHC 1+: Incomplete membrane staining that is faint/ barely perceptible and within >10% of tumour cells.

IHC 2+: Circumferential membrane staining that is incomplete and/or weak/moderate and within > 10% of tumour cells or Complete and circumferential membrane staining that is intense and within ≤ 10% of tumour cells.

IHC 3+: Circumferential membrane staining that is complete, intense, and within > 10% of tumour cells.

For the scoring of HER2/neu protein and EGFR expression, only the membrane staining intensity and pattern were evaluated. Score of 2+ and 3+ were taken as positive.

Results

A total of 2084 cholecystectomy specimens were received during the study period, out of which 40 cases (1.6%) were histopathologically diagnosed as gallbladder carcinoma. The age of the patients ranged from 21 to 86 years with mean age being 55.9 years. A strong female preponderance was seen with 90% being females. There was strong family history of GBC in 5 patients (12.5% cases). The presenting symptoms were commonly nausea (97.5%) followed by pain in right upper abdomen (77.5%). Clinically, only 11 (27.5%) patients were preoperatively diagnosed as carcinoma gall bladder and rest of the 29 (72.5%) cases were diagnosed incidentally (Table 1).

Table 1. Clinical Profile of Study Population.

Characteristics Number of cases Percentage (%)
Age
Mean ± S.D. 55.5 ± 13.1
Median 55
Gender distribution
Male 4 10
Female 36 90
Family History
Present 5 12.5
Absent 35 87.5
Presenting symptoms
Pain Right upper abdomen 31 77.5
Nausea 39 97.5
Vomiting 11 27.5
Dyspepsia 21 52.2
Loss of appetite 16 40
Weight loss 11 27.5
Fever 17 42.5
Obstructive Jaundice 2 5
Clinical Diagnosis
Carcinoma gall bladder 11 27.5
Incidental 29 72.5
Ultrasound findings
Stone
Present 40 100
Absent - -
Wall thickness
0-3 mm 13 32.5
>3mm 27 67.5

On Ultrasound (USG), gallstones were present in all the 40 cases of GBC and gallbladder wall was thickened in 67.5% cases. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was done in 22 (55%) cases followed by open cholecystectomy in 11(27.5%) cases. In rest of the 7 cases, laparoscopy was converted into open cholecystectomy due to adhesions or difficult dissection. Per-operatively localized mass was seen in only 7.5% cases.

On gross examination, gall bladder wall was thickened in 72.5% cases with 50% of these cases showing diffusely thickened wall. Histopathologically, 34 (85%) cases were conventional adenocarcinoma (Figure 1A, B) with other variants being papillary, adenosquamous, and squamous carcinoma.

Figure 1. A, Well-differentiated Adenocarcinoma Composed of Malignant Glands Infiltrating the Muscle Layer of the Gallbladder (H&E, 10X); B, Poorly differentiated Adenocarcinoma of the gallbladder showing cords and singly dispersed malignant cells (H&E, 10X), inset showing perineural invasion (H&E, 40X).

Most of them were moderately differentiated (57.5%) followed by well differentiated (30%) and poorly differentiated in 12.5% of the cases. On pathological staging, most of the cases were seen in stage pT1b (17 cases). Nodes were received in 16 out of 40 cases and were positive in 18.8% cases. Liver bed was involved in 27.3% cases. Out of 40 cases, perineural invasion was seen in 8 cases (20%) and lymphovascular invasion was seen in 12 cases (30%) (Table 2) In our study population, Early (pT1a, pT1b) and advanced (pT2, pT3) stage disease were noted in 57.5% and in 42.5%, cases respectively.

Table 2. Histopathological Characteristics of Cases of Gall Bladder Carcinoma.

  Cases
  Number of cases Percentage (%)
Histopathological Type
Conventional Adenocarcinoma 34 85
Papillary Adenocarcinoma 1 2.5
Adenosquamous carcinoma 1 2.5
Squamous cell carcinoma 2 5
Adenocarcinoma with xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis 2 5
Histopathological Grade
Well differentiated (G1) 12 30
Moderately differentiated (G2) 23 57.5
Poorly differentiated (G3) 5 12.5
Pathological Stage
pT1a 6 15
pT1b 17 42.5
pT2 11 27.5
pT2N1 2 5
pT3 3 7.5
pT3N1 1 2.5
Nodal Status (16 cases) Positive 3 18.6
  Negative 13 81.4
Liver bed(11cases) Involved 3 27.3
  Uninvolved 8 72.7
Peri-neural invasion Present 8 20
  Absent 32 80
Lympho-vascular invasion Present 12 30
  Absent 28 70
Early and advanced stage cancer Early 57.5
  Advanced 42.5

Immunohistochemistry was done with EGFR and HER2/ neu on all 40 cases of GBC. EGFR immunoexpression was present in 29 (72.5%) cases and negative in 11(27.5%) cases. EGFR expression was more in moderately (20 cases) and poorly (5 cases) differentiated cancers (Figure 2A, B) with lesser expression in well differentiated cancers thus showing a parallel increase with the increase in histological grade and this association was found to be significant (p=0.001) EGFR overexpression was also positive in advanced stages of gall bladder carcinoma (16/17 cases;42.5%); thus showing significant association with histological grade and advanced stage of the cancer (P<0.05).

Figure 2. A, High Power Microphotograph of Well Differentiated Adenocarcinoma Gall Bladder Showing 2+ Positivity (EGFR, IHC 40X). B, Microphotograph of Moderately differentiated Adenocarcinoma gall bladder showing 3+ positivity (EGFR, IHC 10X).

However, there was no significant association of EGFR expression with histopathological types, pathological stage, Lymph node status, peri-neural invasion, lymphovascular invasion and liver involvement (P>0.05) (Table 3).

Table 3. EGFR Association with Various Histopathological Parameters.

  EGFR Positive (2+/3+) EGFR negative (0/1+) p-value
  No. % No. %
Histopathological type Conventional Adenocarcinoma 23 57.5 11 27.5 0.613
  Papillary Adenocarcinoma 1 2.5 - -
  Adenosquamous carcinoma 1 2.5 - -
  Squamous cell carcinoma 2 5 - -
  Adenocarcinoma with xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis 2 5 - -
Histologic Grade Well differentiated (G1) 4 10 8 20 0.001
  Moderately differentiated (G2) 20 50 3 7.5
  Poorly differentiated (G3) 5 12.5 - -
Pathological Stage T1a 2 5 4 10 0.098
  T1b 11 27.5 6 15
  T2 10 25 1 2.5
  T2N1 2 5 - -
  T3 3 7.5 - -
  T3N1 1 2.5 - -
LN status (n= 16 cases) Present 3 18.7 - - 1
  Absent 10 62.6 3 18.7
Peri-neural Invasion (n= 40 cases) Present 7 17.5 1 2.5 0.405
  Absent 22 55 10 25
Lymphovascular invasion (n= 40 cases) Present 11 27.5 1 2.5 0.124
  Absent 18 45 10 25
Liver involvement (n= 11 cases) Present 3 27.3 - - 1
  Absent 6 54.5 2 18.2
Early and advanced stage cancer Early 13 32.5 10 25 0.012
  Advanced 16 40 1 2.5

The expression of HER2/neu was positive in 13 (32.5%) cases and negative in 27(67.5%) cases. It was significantly more positive in well differentiated gall bladder carcinoma i.e. 69.2% cases while all the 5 poorly differentiated cases were immunonegative for HER2/neu (Figure 3A, B); thus, showing significant association with histological grade (P<0.05).

Figure 3. A, Microphotograph of Well Differentiated Adenocarcinoma Gall Bladder Showing 3+ Positivity (HER2/ neu, IHC 10X); B, Microphotograph of Moderately differentiated Adenocarcinoma gall bladder showing 2+ positivity (HER2/neu, IHC 40X).

There was no significant association between HER2/neu expression and histopathological types, pathological stage, lymph node status, peri-neural invasion, lymphovascular invasion, liver involvement and advanced stages of gall bladder carcinoma. (P>0.05) (Table 4) In our study intratumoral heterogenicity was also seen in 3 out of the 13 HER2/neu positive cases (Figure 4).

Table 4. HER2/neu Association with Various Histopathological Parameters.

HER2/neu Positive (2+/3+) HER2/neu negative (0/1+) p-value
No % No %
Histopathological type Conventional Adenocarcinoma 11 27.5 23 57.5 0.434
Papillary Adenocarcinoma - - 1 2.5
Adenosquamous carcinoma 1 2.5 - -
Squamous cell carcinoma 1 2.5 1 2.5
Adenocarcinoma with XGC - - 2 5
Histological Grade Well differentiated (G1) 9 22.5 3 7.5 0.0006
Moderately differentiated (G2) 4 10 19 47.5
Poorly differentiated (G3) - - 5 12.5
Pathological Stage T1a 3 7.5 3 7.5 0.435
T1b 5 12.5 12 30
T2 3 7.5 8 20
T2N1 1 2.5 1 2.5
T3 - - 3 7.5
T3N1 1 2.5 - -
LN status (n= 16 cases) Present 2 12.5 1 6.3 0.136
Absent 2 12.5 11 68.7
Perineural Invasion (n= 40 cases) Present 4 10 4 40 0.4
Absent 9 22.5 23 57.5
Lymphovascular invasion (n= 40 cases) Present 4 10 8 20 1
Absent 9 22.5 19 47.5
Liver involvement (n= 11 cases) Present 2 18.2 1 9.1 0.152
Absent 1 9.1 7 17.5
Early and advanced stage cancer Early 15 37.5 8 20 0.72
Advanced 12 30 5 12.5

Figure 4. Intratumoral HER2/neu Heterogeneity Seen in a Case of Well Differentiated Adenocarcinoma Gall Bladder. The HER2/neu by IHC shows weak positivity (score 1+) in the upper part while strong positivity (score 3+) is seen in lower part of the microphotograph (HER2/ neu, IHC 10X).

Out of the 40 cases, 4 cases showed co-expression of EGFR and HER2/neu while both showed immunonegativity in only 2 cases; 25 cases were EGFR positive but HER2/neu negative; while 9 cases were HER2/neu positive but EGFR negative. EGFR expression was seen more in the advanced as compared to the early stage GBC and was statistically significant while HER2/ neu expression was more in the early stage of GBC although this association was not found to be significant. Thus, the immunoexpression of EGFR was inversely related with HER2/neu expression and this association was statistically significant (P<0.05) (Figure 5).

Figure 5. Association of EGFR and HER2/neu Expression.

Discussion

GBC is a highly malignant neoplasm characterized by delayed diagnosis, poor prognosis and ineffective treatment especially in advanced stages. As per the GLOBOCAN 2018 data, [9] about 219,000 people were estimated to have been diagnosed with GBC which constitutes 1.2% of all cancer diagnoses. It accounts for about 165,000 cancer deaths annually, which is 1.7% of all global cancer deaths.The role of radiation, chemoradiation and chemotherapy in neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings in GBC is not well defined. In order to develop targeted therapy for GBC it is very essential to understand various molecular alterations involved in the pathogenesis of cancer. A number of recent studies have identified ERBB2 signalling as the most frequently mutated pathway in GBC. EGFR and HER2/neu are members of the ERBB2 receptor tyrosine kinase family. However, their exact role in the pathogenesis of GBC is not yet fully understood.

A total of 2084 Cholecystectomy specimens were received in our department during the study period; with 1.9% incidence of Gallbladder cancer. The incidence of GBC is more in elderly females (2–6 times) in comparison to males worldwide [10]. Age-adjusted incidence of GBC among females in Delhi is 7.4 persons/100,000 populations per year. It is the fourth most common cancer among females after breast, cervix, and ovary [11].

In our study, the age ranged from 21 to 86 years with mean age of the patients being 55.9 years; 90% of the patients being females. The male: female ratio in our study was 1:9. In a recent study in a tertiary care hospital in New Delhi (2018), the mean age of the patients was 40.2 years (range 20-74 years) with 70% females and 30% males [12]. In another study by Hadi R et al [13] median age was 48 years, 83.33% were females; female predominance being similar to that seen in our study.

In different series of gallbladder cancers, stones have been reported in 60 to 93% of cases and a high proportion of patients had long-term symptoms of cholelithiasis before discovery of tumor [14-17]. Gallbladder cancer and gallstones share common epidemiological characteristics. Similarly, in our study, gallstone disease was seen in 100% of the cases on ultrasonography. However only 87.5% of the patients showed stones on gross examination as rest of the stones were handed over to the patients’ attendants at the time of surgery.

Histopathologically, Conventional Adenocarcinoma was the most common subtype present in our study in 85% of the cases. Papillary Adenocarcinoma and Adenosquamous carcinoma both constituted 2.5% of the cases. This was similar to a study by Ashai F et al, [18] in which most of the cases (98%) were adenocarcinoma and only 2% were adenosquamous carcinoma. In a study by Neyaz et al, out of 268 cases studied, 221 cases were that of conventional adenocarcinoma, 23 invasive papillary carcinoma, 11 mucinous adenocarcinoma, 8 adenosquamous, 1 signet ring, 3 neuroendocrine and 1 undifferentiated carcinoma [19]. So, adenocarcinoma was the most common histopathological type seen in almost all studies on GBC.

The over-expression of markers such as EGFR and HER2/neu may have direct clinical implications with an alternative strategy for the management of gallbladder carcinoma. Our study showed EGFR expression in 72.5% of GBC cases. The range of EGFR expression varies in the literature from 34.6% by Neyaz A et al, [19] 50% by Martins et al, [20], 88% by Kumar N et al, [21] to 100% by Chang PY et al [22].

We used the CAP/ASCO grading system for breast cancer for EGFR immune expression. However, there is no well-defined standard criteria for interpretation of EGFR immunostaining. In our study, EGFR expression showed a significant association with tumor grade (P<0.05); i.e. Well differentiated carcinoma cases were predominantly negative for EGFR; Moderately differentiated cases were predominantly positive for EGFR and all cases of Poorly differentiated carcinoma were positive for EGFR. (Figure 2) So, a significant increase in EGFR expression was observed on increase in grade of GBC (P = 0.001). However, there was no significant association of EGFR expression with tumor stage, histopathology diagnosis, perineural Invasion, lymphovascular invasion, LN status and liver involvement. (P>0.05). However, Kumar N et al [22] reported that with decrease in differentiation of tumor, EGFR immunostaining intensity increased (P = 0.0001). Our results are at par with study by Neyaz et al., [20] who found no significant association of EGFR expression with tumor stage, histopathology diagnosis, perineural invasion, lymphovascular invasion, LN status and liver involvement was observed; however, they found no significant association of EGFR expression with increase in grade of GBC which is in contrast to our study (P>0.05). Similarly, Zhou et al., [23] reported that EGFR high expression was not associated with the parameters, such as age, gender, TNM stage, differentiation, or lymph node status.

HER2/neu (Erb B-2) overexpression in breast cancer has been associated with increased disease recurrence and worse prognosis. Its overexpression is also seen in ovarian cancer, stomach cancer, and uterine serous endometrial carcinoma. There are few but conflicting reports dealing with the clinical significance of HER2/neu expression in GBC, [24] thus our study holds importance in this aspect.

We used the CAP/ASCO scoring criteria established for breast cancer in reporting the IHC results. In our study, HER2/neu positivity of 32.5% (13 cases) was seen in GBC cases which was higher than that reported by Roa I et al., who found HER2/neu overexpression in 14% cases [25].

In both the studies similar reference criteria were used. This underscores the need for establishing a standard uniform scoring system methodology for reporting HER2/ neu overexpression by IHC in gall bladder. HER2/neu overexpression in GBC reported by Neyaz et al.,[20] Singh et al., [26] and Hadi R et al.,[14] were 27.3%, 36.67%, and 66.67%, respectively which was comparable or higher than our study.

In our study, HER2/neu expression showed a significant association with tumor grade (P<0.05); i.e. Well differentiated carcinoma cases were predominantly positive for HER2/neu. The correlation of HER2/neu overexpression with stage and grades of tumour have shown varying results in previous reports. Similar to the findings of our study Chaube et al. (2006), [27] observed a trend of decrease in HER2/neu expression with increasing grade of tumor but the results were not statistically significant which was unlike our study where a statistically significant association was seen. Puhalla et al. (2007) [28] observed that HER2/neu overexpression correlated with advanced tumor stage which was not in accordance with our study.

From our study results, the fact that HER2/neu expression were found more in better differentiated tumour and early cancers may suggest a possible role of HER2/neu as an early event in the carcinogenesis of gallbladder cancer. The wide variation could be due to the different scoring systems adopted by different authors. This highlights the need to evolve a uniform consensus on scoring for HER2/neu staining in gall bladder cancers on similar lines as breast cancer. HER2/neu is an attractive target also because we now have several drugs which could inhibit HER2/neu for anti-cancer effect with successes seen in the treatment of breast and gastric cancer [29]. An anti-HER2/neu agent, lapatinib, when combined with gemcitabine, had a synergistic anti-proliferative effect on a GBC cell line (TGBC1-TKB) in vitro [30].

In the present study, the immunoexpression of EGFR was inversely related with HER2/neu expression and this association was statically significant. (Figure 5) However, Doval et al. [31] found no such significant association of EGFR with HER2/neu (P=1.000). Hadi et al.,[13] reported high positivity of both EGFR and HER2/neu in GBC cases with a positive correlation between them, but they mentioned that large numbers of patients are required for better and consistent results in their setup. Thus we see that EGFR and HER2/neu positivity correlate with tumor grade and thus the targeted treatment can be helpful in increasing the overall survival of the patients.

In conclusion, to conclude, in our study overexpression of EGFR and HER2/neu was seen in 72.5% and 32.5% cases of GBC respectively suggesting that altered expression of these genes maybe a possible mechanism in gallbladder carcinogenesis. Furthermore, EGFR expression was significant in poorly differentiated or advanced stage cancers while HER2/neu expression was seen in well differentiated gall bladder carcinomas thus providing rationale to further explore the use of anti-EGFR and anti-HER2/neu therapy in gallbladder cancer.

References


  1. Gallbladder cancer worldwide: Geographical distribution and risk factors Randi Giorgia, Franceschi Silvia, La Vecchia Carlo. International Journal of Cancer.2006;118(7). CrossRef
  2. Gallbladder cancer: review of a rare orphan gastrointestinal cancer with a focus on populations of New Mexico Nemunaitis Jacklyn M., Brown-Glabeman Ursa, Soares Heloisa, Belmonte Jessica, Liem Ben, Nir Itzhak, Phuoc Victor, Gullapalli Rama R.. BMC Cancer.2018;18(1). CrossRef
  3. Shaffer EA. Gallbladder cancer: the basics Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y).2008;4:737-741.
  4. Current Management of Gallbladder Carcinoma Zhu Andrew X., Hong Theodore S., Hezel Aram F., Kooby David A.. The Oncologist.2010;15(2). CrossRef
  5. Genetic abberations in gallbladder cancer Maurya Sanjeev K., Tewari Mallika, Mishra Raghvendra R., Shukla Hari S.. Surgical Oncology.2012;21(1). CrossRef
  6. Genetics of Biliary Tract Cancers and Emerging Targeted Therapies Hezel Aram F., Deshpande Vikram, Zhu Andrew X.. Journal of Clinical Oncology.2010;28(21). CrossRef
  7. Pathologic TNM staging of carcinomas of the gallbladder and cystic duct Gonzalez RS. PathologyOutlines.comwebsite.https://www.pathologyoutlines.com/topic/gallbladderstaging.html. Accessed October 9th, 2019..
  8. Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing in Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update Wolff Antonio C., Hammond M. Elizabeth Hale, Allison Kimberly H., Harvey Brittany E., Mangu Pamela B., Bartlett John M.S., Bilous Michael, Ellis Ian O., Fitzgibbons Patrick, Hanna Wedad, Jenkins Robert B., Press Michael F., Spears Patricia A., Vance Gail H., Viale Giuseppe, McShane Lisa M., Dowsett Mitchell. Journal of Clinical Oncology.2018;36(20). CrossRef
  9. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries Bray Freddie, Ferlay Jacques, Soerjomataram Isabelle, Siegel Rebecca L., Torre Lindsey A., Jemal Ahmedin. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians.2018;68(6). CrossRef
  10. Trends in Presentation and Survival for Gallbladder Cancer During a Period of More Than 4 Decades Konstantinidis Ioannis T.. Archives of Surgery.2009;144(5). CrossRef
  11. Consolidated ICMR report of Population Based Cancer Registries in the year 2001- 2004 http://www.icmr.nic.in/ncrp/report_pop_200104/cancer_p_based.htm)..
  12. Incidental gallbladder carcinoma: Utility of histopathological evaluation of routine cholecystectomy specimens Jha Vidya, Sharma Preeti, Mandal K. Ashish. South Asian Journal of Cancer.2018;07(01). CrossRef
  13. EGFR and HER-2/neu Expression in Gallbladder Carcinoma: An Institutional Experience Hadi R, Pant MC, Husain N, Singhal A, Khurana R, Agarwal GR, et al . Gulf J Oncolog.2016;1:12-19.
  14. CHOLELITHIASIS IN THE ÆTIOLOGY OF GALLBLADDER NEOPLASMS Hart Jacob, Modan Baruch, Shani Mordechai. The Lancet.1971;297(7710). CrossRef
  15. Natural history study of gallbladder cancer.A review of 36 years experience at M. D. Anderson hospital and tumor institute Perpetuo Maria Do Carmo M. O., Valdivieso Manuel, Heilbrun Lance K., Nelson Robert S., Connor Thomas, Bodey Gerald P.. Cancer.1978;42(1). CrossRef
  16. Carcinoma of the gallbladder in a population of Southwestern American Indians Black William C., Key Charles R., Carmany Thomas B., Herman Doris. Cancer.1977;39(3). CrossRef
  17. Gallstone size and risk of gallbladder cancer Diehl A.K. J Amer Med Ass.1983;250:2323-2326.
  18. Expression of Her2/neu receptor in Carcinoma Gallbladder correlates significantly with advanced tumor stage Ashai Farzana, Ashraf Aadil, Rashid Arshad, Banday Bilal Musharaf, Bhalla Sunita, Dhawan Shashi. International Journal of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases.2015;5. CrossRef
  19. Investigation of targetable predictive and prognostic markers in gallbladder carcinoma Neyaz Azfar, Husain Nuzhat, Gupta Sameer, Kumari Swati, Arora Aditi, Awasthi Namrata Puneet, Malhotra Kiran Preet, Misra Sanjeev. Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.2018;9(1). CrossRef
  20. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) status and prognosis in gallbladder cancer. Martins Sandro José, Pais-Costa Sérgio Renato, Artigiani-Neto Ricardo, Farah José Francisco de Mattos, Franco Maria Isete Fares, Goldemberg Alberto. Journal of Clinical Oncology.2012;30(15_suppl). CrossRef
  21. Epidermal growth factor receptor expression in carcinoma gallbladder: A prospective study in Indian scenario Kumar Nikhilesh, Kumar Nidhish, Khan MajidAli, Rigvardhan , Ranjan Richa, Hazra Nandita. Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics.2016;12(2). CrossRef
  22. Preliminary Experience of Cetuximab in the Treatment of Advanced-Stage Biliary Tract Cancer Chang Ping-Ying, Cheng Ming-Fang, Lee Herng-Sheng, Hsieh Chung-Bao, Yao Nai-Shun. Onkologie.2010;33(1-2). CrossRef
  23. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, epidermal growth factor receptor, and c-MET overexpression and survival in biliary tract cancer: A meta-analysis Fan Lifang, Zhou Wei, Jiang Congqing, Zhan Nan, Lv Xiaoguang, Ninu Maskey. Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics.2018;14(8). CrossRef
  24. Gene amplification of Myc and its coamplification with ERBB2 and EGFR in gallbladder adenocarcinoma Ooi A, Suzuki S, Nazakawa K, Itakura J, Imoto I, Nakamura H, et al . Anticancer Res.2009;29:19-26.
  25. Overexpression of the HER2/neu gene: A new therapeutic possibility for patients with advanced gallbladder cancer Roa I, de Toro G, Schalper K, de Aretxabala X, Churi C, Javle M. Gastrointest Cancer Res.2014;7:42-8.
  26. Prognostic Significance of HER-2 and p53 Expression in Gallbladder Carcinoma in North Indian Patients Singh Anjali, Mishra Pramod K., Saluja Sundeep Singh, Talikoti Majid A., Kirtani Pawan, Najmi Abul Kalam. Oncology.2016;91(6). CrossRef
  27. Preliminary study of p53 and c-erbB-2 expression in gallbladder cancer in Indian patients Chaube Amita, Tewari Mallika, Garbyal RS, Singh Usha, Shukla Hari S. BMC Cancer.2006;6(1). CrossRef
  28. Expression of p21(Wafl/Cip1), p57(Kip2) and HER2/neu in patients with gallbladder cancer Puhalla H, Wrba F, Kandioler D, Lehnert M, Huynh A, Gruenberger T, et al . Anticancer Res.2007;27:1679-1684.
  29. Targeting EGFR/HER2 pathways enhances the antiproliferative effect of gemcitabine in biliary tract and gallbladder carcinomas Pignochino Ymera, Sarotto Ivana, Peraldo-Neia Caterina, Penachioni Junia Y, Cavalloni Giuliana, Migliardi Giorgia, Casorzo Laura, Chiorino Giovanna, Risio Mauro, Bardelli Alberto, Aglietta Massimo, Leone Francesco. BMC Cancer.2010;10(1). CrossRef
  30. A phase II study of lapatinib in patients with advanced biliary tree and hepatocellular cancer Ramanathan Ramesh K., Belani Chandra P., Singh Deepti A., Tanaka Michael, Lenz Heinz-Josef, Yen Yun, Kindler Hedy L., Iqbal Syma, Longmate Jeff, Mack Philip C., Lurje Georg, Gandour-Edwards Regina, Dancey Janet, Gandara David R.. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.2009;64(4). CrossRef

Copyright

© Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Biology , 2021

Author Details

Inara Abeer
B79 gulmohar park new delhi .

Sabina Khan
Affiliation not stated
drsabina1@gmail.com

Mohd. Jaseem Hasan
Department of Pathology, Hamdard Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi - 110062, India

Musharraf Hussain
Prof. and Head of Department of surgery, Hamdard Institute of Medical Sciences &amp; Research Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi - 110062, India

How to Cite

1.
Abeer I, Khan S, Hasan MJ, Hussain M. EGFR and HER2neu Expression in Gall Bladder Carcinoma and Its Association with Clinicopathological Parameters - An Institutional Experience from North India. apjcb [Internet]. 30Mar.2021 [cited 20Sep.2021];6(1):57-5. Available from: http://waocp.com/journal/index.php/apjcb/article/view/543

 


 


  • Abstract viewed - 459 times
  • PDF (FULL TEXT) downloaded - 185 times
  • Xml downloaded - 30 times