Real-world Treatment Patterns in Patients with EGFR Mutation-positive NSCLC Receiving a First-Line, First- or Second-generation EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor in South Korea and Taiwan
Introduction: The preferred first-line (1L) treatment for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive (EGFRm) advanced/metastatic non-small lung cancer (NSCLC) are EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, most patients treated with 1L first- or second-generation (1G/2G) EGFR-TKIs acquire resistance; the EGFR T790M mutation is observed in ~30–50% of patients. We report real-world NSCLC treatment and T790M testing patterns in South Korea and Taiwan.
Methods: Retrospective medical record review of EGFRm advanced/metastatic NSCLC patients from routine practice. 1G/2G EGFR-TKI initiation 1 January 2015–31 December 2017 (follow-up end date: last available medical record or August 2019). Study measures: demographic/disease characteristics, 1L/2L treatment, T790M testing.
Results: In South Korea, 70% (164/235) and in Taiwan 89% (89/100) experienced 1L disease progression (median [range] follow-up: 22 [2.3–50.7] months). Of those with disease progression, 68% (111/164) and 62% (55/89) had T790M testing in South Korea and Taiwan, respectively. In South Korea, 43% (48/111) were T790M-positive with 88% (n=42/48) receiving osimertinib (mostly 2L). In Taiwan, 18% (10/55) were T790M-positive; 100% received osimertinib. Overall, 73% (120/164) and 63% (63/100) in South Korea and Taiwan, respectively, received 2L therapy, predominantly pemetrexed-containing regimens. Among patients with disease progression, 9% (14/164) and 24% (21/89) died before receiving 2L therapy in South Korea and Taiwan, respectively.
Conclusion: In both countries, <70% with 1L disease progression were tested for T790M at any point from NSCLC diagnosis, suggesting resistance mutation testing could be improved. Treatment/testing patterns may have changed in both countries since study initiation due to osimertinib reimbursement changes beginning December 2017.
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations (EGFRm) are observed in a greater proportion of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from Asian populations (32–60%) compared with non-Asian populations (10–30%) [1-3]. In addition, the prevalence of EGFRm in patients with NSCLC from South Korea and Taiwan has been reported to range from 27–51% [4-6] and 34–53% [7-9], respectively.
At the time of this study (2015–2017), guidelines recommended first-line (1L) treatment of EGFRm advanced NSCLC with first- or second-generation (1G/2G) EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) erlotinib, gefitinib or afatinib [10-11]. Despite initial efficacy, most patients with EGFRm advanced or metastatic NSCLC treated with a 1L 1G/2G EGFR-TKI develop resistance, with disease progression occurring after a median of 8 to 16 months [12-14]. The EGFR T790M acquired resistance mutation has been observed in approximately 50% of patients from a meta-analysis of clinical trials  while rates of approximately 30% have been reported in real-world studies [16-18].
Osimertinib is a third-generation, irreversible EGFR-TKI that potently and selectively inhibits both EGFR-TKI sensitizing and EGFR T790M resistance mutations, and has demonstrated efficacy in NSCLC central nervous system (CNS) metastases [19-22]. Following the Phase III AURA3 study, in November 2015 osimertinib received accelerated approval from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency for use as a second-line (2L) treatment in patients with EGFRm T790M-positive locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC who had previously received 1G/2G EGFR TKIs. Approval was received in Taiwan and South Korea in March and May 2017, respectively [23-24]. Following approval, the Ministry of Health and Welfare in South Korea granted reimbursement for osimertinib in the 2L setting in December 2017 . In Taiwan, reimbursement for osimertinib in the 2L setting was granted in April 2020 . Testing of tumors for T790M in patients with resistance to 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs in the 1L setting is now mandatory, with osimertinib considered the standard of care for patients with T790M-positive tumors .
Based on the results of the Phase III FLAURA study, in 2018 osimertinib received approval as a 1L treatment for patients with metastatic NSCLC whose tumors harbored EGFR-TKI sensitizing mutations (exon 19 deletion [Ex19del] or L858R) [27-28]. In line with this, the current Pan Asian guidelines from 2019 now recommend 1L treatment with EGFR-TKIs, including osimertinib, for patients with metastatic NSCLC with tumors harboring an EGFR-TKI sensitizing mutation .
While the use of 1L 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs in patients with EGFRm locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC was well defined at the time of this study, published real-world data for treatment of these patients following NSCLC disease progression are limited in South Korea and Taiwan. This study was designed to review the real-world treatment patterns and T790M testing practices of patients in these settings.
Materials and Methods
Study Design and Data Source
This was a retrospective, non-interventional medical record review in selected patients with EGFRm NSCLC from routine clinical practice settings in France, Germany, South Korea, Taiwan, UK and US; here, we describe results from South Korea and Taiwan and data from France, Germany, UK and US are described elsewhere.
Following appropriate ethics submissions and approvals, data were obtained through the use of an electronic data collection form (eDCF), which was completed by physicians or delegated clinical research staff, from medical record reviews of eligible patients. The forms were accessed via a secure web-based link specific to each site and records for each patient in the analytic dataset were then linked by an encrypted identifier. The study was performed in accordance with ethical principles that are consistent with the Declaration of Helsinki, International Conference on Harmonization Good Clinical Practices and local standards in South Korea and Taiwan. Patient consent was not required because of the retrospective nature of the study.
Physicians participating in the study were required to have treated ≥4 patients with EGFRm NSCLC in the year preceding the study, ≥2 years’ experience in medical practice managing oncology treatment including responsibility for making treatment decision for patients with NSCLC, and to have spent ≥60% of their time in patient care (as judged by the participating physician).
Records for adults ≥20 years of age at first diagnosis of confirmed EGFRm locally advanced unresectable or metastatic NSCLC, who had received 1L 1G/2G EGFR- TKI treatment were included; at the time of medical record abstraction, patients could have been alive or deceased. 1L EGFR-TKI treatment (afatinib, gefitinib, erlotinib) must have been initiated between January 1 2015 and December 31 2017. Patient data were not included if they had previously been enrolled in an interventional clinical trial for an EGFRm NSCLC-related treatment or received any systemic therapy for locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC prior to 1L EGFR-TKI treatment. Patient data were also excluded if there were missing or unknown dates for: initial NSCLC diagnosis, first diagnosis of progression to advanced or metastatic NSCLC, 1L EGFR- TKI initiation for advanced or metastatic disease, death, or last available follow-up.
The objectives of the study included describing patients’ demographic and baseline disease characteristics; the proportion of patients that had, or went on to develop CNS metastases (diagnosis: tissue biopsy, imaging, spinal tap, neurologic exam) or leptomeningeal disease (LM; diagnosis: cerebrospinal fluid cytology, tissue, imaging); 1L EGFR-TKI type used; and the proportion of patients that experienced disease progression on 1L 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs. In patients with disease progression on 1L EGFR-TKI treatment the objectives were to describe the proportion of patients that received 2L and type of therapy started; the proportion of patients tested for T790M and were positive; of the patients who were T790M tested and who were not tested, what proportion received 2L and type of therapy initiated.
The index date was defined as the first date on which a patient newly initiated a 1G/2G EGFR-TKI as 1L treatment for EGFRm locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC, and had to occur within a 3-year period from January 1 2015 through December 31 2017 (study entry window); patient data was abstracted through to last available medical record (data cut-off: 01 August 2019). Any data available from before or after the study index date through to the date of the medical record abstraction was subject to review. The study entry window for 1L EGFR TKI initiation was selected to balance the opportunity for maximal follow-up with the capture of recently prevailing patterns of care.
The study aimed to include 235 patients from South Korea and 100 patients from Taiwan. Each participating physician was anticipated to contribute 15 to 20 patient records. All analyses were descriptive in nature and no statistical comparisons were made between patient data from the two countries. Study variables were summarized using univariate statistics, including mean, standard deviation, median and range for continuous variables and frequency distributions for categorical variables.
A total of 27 physicians participated in the South Korean study and 13 physicians in the Taiwan study. Their medical specialty was primarily medical/clinical oncologist (South Korea: 74%; Taiwan: 54%), followed by hematologist (South Korea: 26%; Taiwan: 46%). The median (range) number of years in practice was 20 (10–28) and 10 (5–20) years in South Korea and Taiwan, respectively.
Baseline Patient Demographics and Disease Characteristics
From South Korea, 235 patients with EGFRm locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC were identified for inclusion in the study (Table 1).
|Characteristic, n (%)||South Korean population||Taiwan population|
|Age at index datea, Median (Min, Max)||70 (40–93)||65 (36–94)|
|31–50||15 (6)||11 (11)|
|51–65||78 (33)||41 (41)|
|66–75||73 (31)||25 (25)|
|75+||69 (29)||23 (23)|
|Sex, n (%)|
|Male||86 (37)||34 (34)|
|Female||149 (63)||66 (66)|
|Smoking status at initial NSCLC diagnosis|
|Current smoker||19 (8)||5 (5)|
|Former smoker||58 (25)||9 (9)|
|Never smoker||151 (64)||86 (86)|
|Unknown||7 (3)||0 (0)|
|Stageb at initial NSCLC diagnosis|
|Early (Stage IA, IB, IIA, IIB)||18 (8)||3 (3)|
|Limited Regional (Stage IIIA)||4 (2)||5 (3)|
|Locally Advanced (Stage IIIB)||4 (2)||3 (3)|
|Metastatic (Stage IV)||208 (89)||89 (89)|
|Unknown||1 (<1)||0 (0)|
|EGFR mutation type (tested positive)c,d|
|Exon 19 deletion||135 (57)||43 (43)|
|L858R mutation||89 (38)||44 (44)|
|Uncommon||18 (8)||19 (19)|
|Exon20/T790M||3 (1)||1 (1)|
|Other mutations (tested positive)c|
|PD-L1 expression||14 (6)||11 (11)|
|ALK rearrangement||15 (6)||0|
|HER2 exon 20 insertion||0||0|
|TP53 (any variant)||0||0|
|None of the mutations listed above||176 (75)||3 (3)|
|Unknown||30 (13)||86 (86)|
|ECOG PS at first diagnosis of locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC|
|0||78 (33)||19 (19)|
|1||70 (30)||46 (46)|
|2||10 (4)||8 (8)|
|3||5 (2)||3 (3)|
|ECOG not recorded at initial NSCLC diagnosis||72 (31)||24 (24)|
ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; aIndex date defined as first date on which a patient newly initiated a 1G/2G EGFR TKI as 1L treatment for EGFR-mutated locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC; bAJCC TMN Classification of Lung Cancer (7th edition); cCategories not mutually exclusive; column percentages may sum to greater than 100%; dMutations other than del‐19 or L858R, for example, L861Q, T790M, G719X, V769M, Moc31, exon 21, p.L861Q
The majority of patients had a histologic diagnosis of adenocarcinoma (231; 98%), median (range) age at index was 70 (40–93) years, with 142 patients (60%) ≥65 years of age; 149 patients (63%) were female and, overall, 151 (64%) never smokers. At initial NSCLC diagnosis, most patients had metastatic disease (stage IV)  (89%), followed by early stage disease (stage IA, IB, IIA and IIB)  (8%), limited regional (stage IIIA)  (2%), locally advanced (stage IIIB)  (2%), and unknown (<1%). At the time of diagnosis with advanced or metastatic NSCLC, 148 patients (63%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) score of 0 or 1. The majority of patients tested positive for Ex19del (n=135 [57%]), 89 (38%) tested positive for L858R mutation and 21 (9%) tested positive for other mutations (both single and co-occurring mutations; Table 1). Patients were followed up from index date until last available medical record for a median duration of 23.7 (0.1–56.7) months.
One hundred patients from Taiwan with EGFRm NSCLC receiving 1L 1G/2G EGFR TKI treatment were identified for inclusion (Table 1). All patients had a histologic diagnosis of adenocarcinoma. Median (range) age at index was 65 (36–94) years, with 48 patients (48%) ≥65 years of age, 66 patients (66%) were female and 86 (86%) never smokers. At initial NSCLC diagnosis, most patients had metastatic disease (stage IV)  (89%), followed by limited regional (stage IIIA) (5%)  early stage disease (stage IA, IB, IIA and IIB) (3%),  and locally advanced (stage IIIB)  (3%). At the time of diagnosis with advanced or metastatic NSCLC, 65 patients (65%) had an ECOG PS score of 0 or 1. Overall, 44 patients (44%) tested positive for the L858R mutation, followed by Ex19del in 43 patients (43%); eleven patients (11%) tested positive for PD-L1 expression and 20 patients (20%) were positive for uncommon EGFR mutations, in isolation or in combinations. Patients were followed up for a median duration of 22.1 (2.3–50.7) months.
Incidence of CNS Metastases and LM Disease
In the South Korean cohort, 69 patients (29%) had CNS metastases at diagnosis of locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC, while 162 patients (69%) had no CNS metastases on scans at this first diagnosis, and in 4 patients (2%) presence or absence of CNS metastases were unknown. From the Taiwan cohort, at diagnosis of locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC, 25 patients (25%) had CNS metastases, 72 patients (72%) had no CNS metastases on scans at this first diagnosis, and in 3 patients (3%) presence or absence of CNS metastases were unknown.
Two patients in each cohort (representing <1% and 2% of the study populations from South Korea and Taiwan, respectively) had LM disease at advanced/ metastatic NSCLC diagnosis; at index 3 patients (1%) in the South Korean cohort and 1 patient (1%) in the Taiwan cohort had LM disease. Four patients (2%) in the South Korean cohort and 5 patients (5%) from the Taiwan cohort, who did not have LM disease at advanced/metastatic NSCLC diagnosis, subsequently developed LM disease.
1L EGFR-TKI Treatment Patterns
At diagnosis of locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC, all patients received a 1L 1G/2G EGFR-TKI as monotherapy (Table 2). In the South Korea cohort, 45% of patients received afatinib, 43% received gefitinib and 13% received erlotinib; the median duration of 1L treatment was 10.3 (0.1–37.2) months. In the Taiwan cohort, a similar proportion of patients received afatinib (27%), erlotinib (37%) or gefitinib (36%) as their 1L EGFR TKI treatment; the median duration of 1L treatment was 9.9 (1.9–42.4) months.
2L Therapy after 1L Treatment Progression
In the South Korea cohort, 120/164 patients (73%) who experienced disease progression on 1L treatment received 2L therapy (Table 2). Fourteen patients (9%) of the 164 with a progression event died before they received 2L. Pemetrexed was the most common 2L treatment received (49/120; 41%), followed by osimertinib (38/120; 32%), and cisplatin plus pemetrexed (17/120; 14%; Table 2). The median (range) duration of 2L treatment was 3.2 (0.1, 26.9) months.
Eighty-nine patients experienced disease progression on 1L treatment in the Taiwan cohort, of whom 63 (71%) received a 2L therapy (Table 2).
|South Korean population||Taiwan population|
|Regimen distribution in 1L, n (%)|
|Median (range) duration of 1L treatment, months||10.3 (0.1–37.2)||9.9 (1.9–42.4)|
|Erlotinib||30 (13)||37 (37)|
|Gefitinib||100 (43)||36 (36)|
|Afatinib||105 (45)||27 (27)|
|Second-line treatment regimen, n (%)||(n=120)||(n=63)|
|Median (range) duration of 2L treatment, months||3.2 (0.1–26.9)||3.3 (0.03–19.8)|
|Cisplatin + pemetrexed||17 (14)||28 (44)|
|Carboplatin + pemetrexed||0||5 (8)|
|Cisplatin + gemcitabine||2 (2)||3 (5)|
|Pemetrexed||49 (41)||3 (3)|
|Carboplatin + gemcitabine||4 (3)||1 (2)|
|Bevacizumab + carboplatin + gemcitabine||0||1 (2)|
|Gemcitabine + vincristine||1 (1)||0|
|Cisplatin + docetaxel + pemetrexed||0||1 (2)|
|Osimertinib||38 (32)||16 (25)|
|Erlotinib||1 (1)||1 (2)|
|EGFR-TKI + chemotherapy|
|Carboplatin + osimertinib + paclitaxel||0||1 (2)|
|Carboplatin + osimertinib + pemetrexed||0||1 (2)|
|Osimertinib + pemetrexed||0||1 (2)|
|Cisplatin + pembrolizumab||0||2 (3)|
1L, first line; 2L, second line; 3L, third line; 4L, fourth line; EGFR epidermal growth factor receptor; TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor
Of the 89 patients who had disease progression 21 (24%) died before receiving 2L therapy. The most frequently received 2L therapy was cisplatin plus pemetrexed in 28/63 patients (44%), followed by osimertinib monotherapy in 16/63 patients (25%). The median (range) duration of 2L therapy was 3.3 (0.03–19.8) months.
T790M Mutation Testing
Of the 164 patients who experienced disease progression on 1L treatment in the South Korea cohort, 111 patients (68%) received testing for T790M, with 48/111 patients (43%) whose tumors tested positive (Figure 1A); in addition, 47/71 patients (66%) who did not experience disease progression on 1L treatment were tested for T790M. In the majority of patients, the test type was categorized as ‘other’ (106/158; 67%), with the PNA ClampTM EGFR mutation detection kit v2.0 most commonly used (49/106; 46%). The test type was not known in 50/158 patients (32%). Of the 48 patients whose tumors tested positive for T790M, 42 (88%) subsequently received osimertinib (Figure 1A).
Of the 63 patients (57%) whose tumors tested negative for T790M, 8 (13%) received osimertinib at 2L or later (Figure 1). Median time to next treatment in patients whose tumors were T790M tested was 16.4 months (13.9, 17.5) and 16.5 months (12.2, 22.5) in patients who were not tested.
In the Taiwan cohort, of the 89 patients who experienced disease progression on 1L treatment, 55 patients (62%) underwent T790M testing, with 10 patients (18%) whose tumors tested T790M positive (Figure 1B); in addition, the tumors of 7 of the 11 patients (64%) who did not experience disease progression on 1L treatment were tested for T790M. Most patients had their T790M mutation status confirmed by test type categorized as ‘other’ (46/62; 74%); the most common test type used in this category was the MassARRAY genotyping kit (37/46; 80%). The test type was categorized as unknown for 5 patients (8%). Of the 10 patients who had tumors that tested positive for T790M, all received osimertinib 2L or later (Figure 1B). From the 45/55 patients (82%) with 1L disease progression whose tumors tested negative for T790M, 16/45 (36%) subsequently received regimens including osimertinib 2L or later. Median time to next treatment in patients who were T790M tested was 12.6 months (9.6, 17.1) and 12.7 months (9.9, 42.3) in patients who were not tested.
Osimertinib Treatment and Line of Treatment
Overall, 54/235 patients (23%) in the South Korea cohort and 27/100 patients (27%) in the Taiwan cohort received osimertinib at 2L or later. The majority (38/54 [70%] patients and 16/27 [59%] for South Korea and Taiwan, respectively) received osimertinib monotherapy in the 2L setting.
This retrospective, non-interventional medical record review evaluated real-world treatment patterns and T790M testing practices in patients with EGFRm advanced/ metastatic NSCLC receiving 1L 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs in populations in South Korea and Taiwan.
The demographics of the patients eligible for inclusion in this analysis were generally similar to those observed in randomized, clinical trials of EGFRm NSCLC in Asian cohorts, with the exception of the high proportion of never smokers in the Taiwan cohort (86% vs ~60%) [30-31] and the older population in the South Korea cohort compared with Taiwan; the median age of patients from South Korea was 70 years (>60% aged ≥65 years) whereas in clinical trials, the median age of patients was up to 7 years younger [30, 32-33].
In the Taiwan cohort, 1L afatinib, erlotinib and gefitinib were prescribed at similar frequencies. By contrast, in the South Korean cohort nearly half (45%) of the patients received the second-generation EGFR-TKI afatinib as 1L treatment, with a similar proportion (43%) receiving gefitinib, while erlotinib was only prescribed to 13% of patients. This prescribing pattern, with a preference for gefitinib over erlotinib as the 1L treatment, may reflect the different AE profiles of the two treatment and physician/ patient choice of treatment. In particular, higher rates of anorexia and skin rash have been reported with erlotinib compared with gefitinib, which may impact treatment choice, particularly in older patients and female patients who may be concerned about the cosmetic impact of skin reactions [32, 34-35]. These prescribing patterns may reflect the older and predominantly female patient population in the South Korean cohort. However, it would be expected that physicians/patients in Taiwan would have similar considerations, so the different prescribing patterns noted between countries may also be due to the small sample size of Taiwanese patients. In another real-world study which enrolled nearly 6000 patients with stage IIIB and IV NSCLC receiving EGFR-TKIs in Taiwan between 2011 to 2015, 67% of patients received gefitinib, while 20% of patients received erlotinib , which is more in line with the relative proportions of gefitinib and erlotinib used in South Korean patients in our study. Also, in this larger Taiwanese study, there were more elderly (≥65 years: 55% versus 50%) and female patients (66% vs 56%) in the gefitinib group compared with the erlotinib group .
Our study showed that 70% and 89% of patients in the South Korean and Taiwan cohorts, respectively, had disease progression during the study period and a considerable proportion of the patients who experienced disease progression (20% and 36%, respectively) did not receive a test for the T790M resistance mutation. Of patients with disease progression, the majority (67% in South Korea and 70% in Taiwan) did not receive any line of osimertinib. Osimertinib was prescribed off-label in patients who tested negative for T790M in both South Korea (8/63; 13%) and Taiwan (16/45; 36%). Although the reasons for why patients’ tumors were not tested for T790M or did not receive 2L therapy were not recorded in the eDCF, this finding suggested a potential unmet need in disease management and treatment in these populations.
The number of patients in the Taiwan cohort with T790M-positive tumors was low (18% vs 43% in the South Korean cohort), which is more similar to that observed in other real-world studies with Asian and non-Asian cohorts (approximately 30%) [16-18] than in clinical trials (approximately 50%) [15, 37]. It is worth noting that the incidence of uncommon/complex EGFR mutations (20%) in the Taiwan cohort was slightly higher than rates seen in other studies (12–16%) of Asian patient cohorts [38-39].
In both countries, approximately a quarter of patients had CNS metastases at diagnosis of locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC and a further 15% and 10% of patients, respectively, went on to develop CNS metastases during the study. CNS metastases frequently occur in patients with EGFRm NSCLC and are associated with poor outcomes . In the 1L setting in the FLAURA study, osimertinib has been shown to reduce the risk of CNS progression by 52% versus comparator EGFR-TKIs (HR, 0.48; P=0.014) . Early intervention with osimertinib could reduce the risk of CNS progression in patients with CNS metastases.
Limitations of the study included the retrospective nature of a chart review, meaning data were more likely to be missing, along with the potential for selection bias in patients included in the study. While all patients who met the inclusion criteria were included, patients who died early on in the study period may have been less likely to be included than those who were alive at data abstraction. Furthermore, it was not possible to determine why testing for T790M was not completed in all patients who had experienced disease progression. During the majority of this study, osimertinib was not approved or reimbursed in South Korea or Taiwan, which may have resulted in lower than expected T790M testing and treatment with 2L osimertinib. Since the study was completed, treatment and testing patterns may have changed due to changes in 2L osimertinib reimbursement status and the approval of osimertinib in the 1L setting. Finally, data were abstracted from medical records of 27 physicians in South Korea and 13 physicians in Taiwan, thus limiting the generalizability of treatment patterns across the countries as a whole.
In conclusion, our real-world study of treatment patterns and T790M testing practices in patients with advanced/metastatic EGFRm NSCLC receiving 1L 1G/2G EGFR TKI treatment indicated that a large proportion of patients in South Korea and Taiwan did not receive 2L therapy after disease progression, highlighting the importance of 1L treatment decisions. In addition, improvements in resistance mutation testing were needed, although 2L therapy utilization was as per the recommendations for the majority of T790M-positive patients. These treatment patterns may have changed since study initiation as osimertinib received reimbursement status for 2L treatment in South Korea and Taiwan from December 2017 onwards, so follow-up studies are required.
The study was funded by AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK, the manufacturer of osimertinib. Medical writing support for the development of this manuscript, under the direction of the authors, was provided by Alexandra Webster, MSc, of Ashfield MedComms (Witney, UK), an Ashfield Health company, and was funded by AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK in accordance with Good Publication Practice (GPP3) guidelines. The authors thank the investigators who participated in this study.
Young-Chul Kim has received research grants from AstraZeneca, Roche, and Boehringer Ingelheim. Keith L Davis is an employee of RTI Health Solutions. Saurabh P Nagar is an employee of RTI Health Solutions; and has received consulting fees from AstraZeneca. Aliki Taylor is an employee of AstraZeneca; reports ownership of stocks/ shares in AstraZeneca. Sung Yong Lee reports honoraria from AstraZeneca. Jin-Yuan Shih reports honoraria from AstraZeneca, Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Chugai Pharma, Ono Pharmaceutical, and Bristol-Myers Squibb; and has received consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Chugai Pharma, Ono Pharmaceutical, Takeda, CStone Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, and Bristol- Myers Squibb. Jae Cheol Lee, Jen-Yu Hung, Gee-Chen Chang, Seung Soo Yoo and Sheng-Hsiung Yang have no conflict of interest to report.
- The prevalence of EGFR mutation in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis Zhang Y, Yuan J, Wang K, Fu X, Han X, Threapleton D, Yang Z, Mao C, Tang J. Oncotarget.2016;7(48). CrossRef
- EGFR mutation incidence in non-small-cell lung cancer of adenocarcinoma histology: a systematic review and global map by ethnicity (mutMapII) Midha A, Dearden S, McCormack R. Am J Cancer Res.2015;5(9):2892-2911.
- Clinical outcome of treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in patients harboring uncommon EGFR mutation Chantharasamee J, Poungvarin N, Danchaivijitr P, Techawatanawanna S. BMC Cancer.2019;19(1):701. CrossRef
- Detection of targetable genetic alterations in Korean lung cancer patients: a comparison study of single-gene assays and targeted next-generation sequencing Park E, Shim HS. Cancer Res Treat.2020;52(2). CrossRef
- Analysis of mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor gene in Korean patients with non-small cell lung cancer: summary of a nationwide survey Lee SH, Kim WS, Choi YD, Seo JW, Han JH, Kim MJ, Kim L, Lee GK, Lee CH, Oh MH, Kim GY, Sung SH, Lee KY, Chang SH, Rho MS, Kim HK, Jung SH, Jang SJ. J Pathol Transl Med.2015;49(6). CrossRef
- High incidence of EGFR mutations in Korean men smokers with no intratumoral heterogeneity of lung adenocarcinomas: correlation with histologic subtypes, EGFR/TTF-1 expressions, and clinical features Sun P, Seol H, Lee HJ, Yoo SB, Kim H, Xu X, Jheon S, Lee C, Lee J, Chung J. J Thorac Oncol.2012;7(2). CrossRef
- EGFR mutation testing practices within the Asia Pacific region: results of a multicenter diagnostic survey Yatabe Y, Kerr KM, Utomo A, Rajadurai P, Tran VK, Du X, Chou T, Enriquez MLD, Lee GK, Iqbal J, Shuangshoti S, Chung J, Hagiwara K, Liang Z, Normanno N, Park K, Toyooka S, Tsai C, Waring P, Zhang L, McCormack R, Ratcliffe M, Itoh Y, Sugeno M, Mok T. J Thorac Oncol.2015;10(3). CrossRef
- Correlation between familial cancer history and epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in Taiwanese never smokers with non-small cell lung cancer: a case-control study Cheng P, Cheng Y. J Thorac Dis.2015;7(3):281-287. CrossRef
- Clinical and biological features associated with epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations in lung cancers Shigematsu H, Lin L, Takahashi T, Nomura M, Suzuki M, Wistuba II, Fong KM, Lee H, Toyooka S, Shimizu N, Fujisawa T, Feng Z, Roth JA, Herz J, Minna JD, Gazdar AF. J Natl Cancer Inst.2005;97(5). CrossRef
- Systemic therapy for stage IV non–small-cell lung cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update Hanna N, Johnson D, Temin S, Baker S, Brahmer J, Ellis PM, Giaccone G, Hesketh PJ, Jaiyesimi I, Leighl NB, Riely GJ, Schiller JH, Schneider BJ, Smith TJ, Tashbar J, Biermann WA, Masters G. J Clin Oncol.2017;35(30). CrossRef
- Metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up Novello S, Barlesi F, Califano R, Cufer T, Ekman S, Levra MG, Kerr K, Popat S, Reck M, Senan S, Simo GV, Vansteenkiste J, Peters S. Ann Oncol.2016;27. CrossRef
- Acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in EGFR-mutant lung cancer: distinct natural history of patients with tumors harboring the T790M mutation Oxnard GR, Arcila ME, Sima CS, Riely GJ, Chmielecki J, Kris MG, Pao W, Ladanyi M, Miller V. Clin Cancer Res.2010;17(6). CrossRef
- Analysis of tumor specimens at the time of acquired resistance to EGFR-TKI therapy in 155 patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancers Yu HA, Arcila ME, Rekhtman N, Sima CS, Zakowski MF, Pao W, Kris MG, Miller VA, Ladanyi M, Riely GJ. Clin Cancer Res.2013;19(8). CrossRef
- Real-world experience of first-line afatinib in patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC: a multicenter observational study Ho G, Chai C, Alip A, Wahid MIA, Abdullah MM, Foo Y, How S, Zaatar A, Lam K, Leong K, Low J, Yusof MM, Lee EC, Toh Y, Liam C. BMC Cancer.2019;19(1):896. CrossRef
- Frequency of the acquired resistant mutation T790 M in non-small cell lung cancer patients with active exon 19Del and exon 21 L858R: a systematic review and meta-analysis Wang Z, Ren S, Li W, Gao G. BMC Cancer.2018;18(1). CrossRef
- Real-world EGFR T790M testing in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a prospective observational study in Japan Seto T, Nogami N, Yamamoto N, Atagi S, Tashiro N, Yoshimura Y, Yabuki Y, Saka H. Oncol Ther.2018;6(2). CrossRef
- Observational study of treatment patterns in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer after first-line EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors Nadler E, Pavilack M, Espirito JL, Clark J, Fernandes A. Adv Ther.2020;37(2). CrossRef
- EGFR mutation testing and treatment decisions in patients progressing on first- or second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors Chiang AC, Fernandes AW, Pavilack M, Wu JW, Laliberté F, Duh MS, Chehab N, Subramanian J. BMC Cancer.2020;20(1). CrossRef
- AZD9291, an irreversible EGFR TKI, overcomes T790M- mediated resistance to EGFR inhibitors in lung cancer Cross DA, Ashton SE, Ghiorghiu S, Eberlein C, Nebhan CA, Spitzler PJ, Orme JP, Finlay MRV, Ward RA, Mellor MJ, Hughes G, Rahi A, Jacobs VN, Brewer MR, Ichihara E, Sun J, Jin H, Ballard P, Al-Kadhimi K, Rowlinson R, Klinowska T, Richmond GH, Cantarini M, Kim D, Ranson MR, Pao W. Cancer Discov.2014;4(9). CrossRef
- Osimertinib in untreated EGFR-mutated advanced non–small-cell lung cancer Soria J, Ohe Y, Vansteenkiste J, Reungwetwattana T, Chewaskulyong B, Lee KH, Dechaphunkul A, Imamura F, Nogami N, Kurata T, Okamoto I, Zhou C, Cho BC, Cheng Y, Cho EK, Voon PJ, Planchard D, Su W, Gray JE, Lee S, Hodge R, Marotti M, Rukazenkov Y, Ramalingam SS. N Engl J Med.2018;378(2). CrossRef
- CNS response to osimertinib versus standard epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with untreated EGFR-mutated advanced non–small-cell lung cancer Reungwetwattana T, Nakagawa K, Cho BC, Cobo M, Cho EK, Bertolini A, Bohnet S, Zhou C, Lee KH, Nogami N, Okamoto I, Leighl N, Hodge R, McKeown A, Brown AP, Rukazenkov Y, Ramalingam SS, Vansteenkiste J. J Clin Oncol.2018;36(33). CrossRef
- Overall survival with osimertinib in untreated, EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC Ramalingam SS, Vansteenkiste J, Planchard D, Cho BC, Gray JE, Ohe Y, Zhou C, Reungwetwattana T, Cheng Y, Chewaskulyong B, Shah R, Cobo M, Lee KH, Cheema P, Tiseo M, John T, Lin M, Imamura F, Kurata T, Todd A, Hodge R, Saggese M, Rukazenkov Y, Soria J. N Engl J Med.2020;382(1). CrossRef
- Lung cancer therapy Tagrisso’s price cut by 96%: Korea Biomedical Review; 2017 Chu M. Available from: http://www.koreabiomed.com/news/articleView. html?idxno=2024..
- Tagrisso approved in China as first-in-class treatment for EGFR T790M mutation-positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: AstraZeneca; 2017 Available from: https:// www.astrazeneca.com/media-centre/press-releases/2017/ tagrisso-approved-in-china-as-first-in-class-treatment-for- egfr-t790m-mutation-positive-metastatic-non-small-cell- lung-cancer-27032017.html..
- An observational study of acquired EGFR T790M-dependent resistance to EGFR-TKI treatment in lung adenocarcinoma patients in Taiwan Wu S, Chiang C, Liu C, Wang C, Su P, Hsia T, Shih J, Chang G. Front Oncol.2020;10:1481. CrossRef
- Pan-Asian adapted Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a CSCO-ESMO initiative endorsed by JSMO, KSMO, MOS, SSO and TOS Wu Y, Planchard D, Lu S, Sun H, Yamamoto N, Kim D, Tan D, Yang J, Azrif M, Mitsudomi T, Park K, Soo R, Chang J, Alip A, Peters S, Douillard J. Ann Oncol.2019;30(2). CrossRef
- US Food and Drug Administration. TAGRISSO® (osimertinib). Highlights of Prescribing Information. 2018 Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2018/208065s008lbl.pdf..
- European Medicines Agency. TAGRISSO™ (osimertinib) Summary of Product Characteristics. 2018 Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product- information/tagrisso-epar-product-information_en.pdf..
- AJCC Cancer Staging Handbook. 7th ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2010 XIX, 718. ISBN: 978-0-387-88442-4 Edge S, Byrd D, Compton C, Fritz A, Greene F, Trotti A, et al . .
- Osimertinib versus standard of care EGFR TKI as first-line treatment in patients with EGFRm advanced NSCLC: FLAURA Asian Subset Cho BC, Chewaskulyong B, Lee KH, Dechaphunkul A, Sriuranpong V, Imamura F, Nogami N, Kurata T, Okamoto I, Zhou C, Cheng Y, Cho EK, Voon PJ, Lee J, Mann H, Saggese Me, Reungwetwattana T, Ramalingam SS, Ohe Y. J Thorac Oncol.2019;14(1). CrossRef
- High efficacy of erlotinib in Taiwanese NSCLC patients in an expanded access program study previously treated with chemotherapy Perng R, Yang C, Chen Y, Chang G, Lin M, Hsieh R, Chu N, Lai R, Su W, Tsao C, Hsia T, Chen H, Chen C, Huang M, Wang J, Ho M, Chung C, Yu Chong-Jen, Chang W, Kuo H, Yu C, Lin Z, Kao W. Lung Cancer.2008;62(1). CrossRef
- Erlotinib monotherapy for stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter trial by the Korean Cancer Study Group Uhm JE, Park B, Ahn M, Lee J, Ahn JS, Kim SW, Kim H, Lee JS, Kang JH, Cho JY, Song HS, Park SH, Sohn CH, Shin SW, Choi JH, Park K. J Thorac Oncol.2009;4(9). CrossRef
- Efficacy and safety of erlotinib in 1242 East/South-East Asian patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer Mok T, Wu Y, Au JS, Zhou C, Zhang L, Perng R, Park K. J Thorac Oncol.2010;5(10). CrossRef
- Efficacy and safety of afatinib for EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer, compared with gefitinib or erlotinib Kim Y, Lee S, Ahn JS, Ahn M, Park K, Sun J. Cancer Res Treat.2019;51(2). CrossRef
- Comparison of gefitinib, erlotinib and afatinib in non‐small cell lung cancer: a meta‐analysis Yang Z, Hackshaw A, Feng Q, Fu X, Zhang Y, Mao C, Tang J. Int J Cancer.2017;140(12). CrossRef
- Comparing the effectiveness of different EGFR‐TKIs in patients with EGFR mutant non–small‐cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study in Taiwan Hsieh Y, Fang W, Lo Y, Chen Y, Chien L. Int J Cancer.2020;147(4). CrossRef
- EGFR mutation analysis for prospective patient selection in AURA3 phase III trial of osimertinib versus platinum-pemetrexed in patients with EGFR T790M-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer John T, Akamatsu H, Delmonte A, Su W, Lee JS, Chang G, Huang X, Jenkins S, Wu Y. Lung Cancer.2018;126. CrossRef
- A comprehensive review of uncommon EGFR mutations in patients with non-small cell lung cancer Tu H, Ke E, Yang J, Sun Y, Yan H, Zheng M, Bai X, Wang Z, Su Jian, Chen Z, Zhang X, Dong Z, Wu S, Jiang B, Chen H, Wang B, Xu C, Zhou Q, Mei P, Luo D, Zhong W, Yang X, Wu Y. Lung Cancer.2017;114. CrossRef
- Prevalence of uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) alterations detected in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients from East Asia Ahn B, Loong H, Chan O, Lee M, Olsen S, Cho B, et al . J Clin Oncol.2020;38(15_suppl):e21608-e.
- Epidermal growth factor receptor mutational status and brain metastases in non–small-cell lung cancer Bhatt VR, D’Souza SP, Smith LM, Cushman-Vokoun AM, Noronha V, Verma V, Joshi A, Chougule A, Jambhekar N, Kessinger A, Marr A, Patil V, Banavali SD, Ganti AK, Prabhash K. J Glob Oncol.2017;3(3). CrossRef
- Abstract viewed - 494 times
- PDF (FULL TEXT) downloaded - 149 times
- Xml downloaded - 29 times