Review and Meta-analysis
DOI: 10.31557/apjcc.2020.5.S1.109-112
Submitted: 2020-07-18
Published: 2021-01-13

Dilemma and Strategies Amidst Nationwide Covid-19 Lockdown for Lung Cancer Management

Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Rajiv Ratan Central Hospital, Chandrapur, Maharashtra
Department of Oncoanaesthesia & Palliative Medicine, DR BRAIRCH, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
Department of Superspeciality Anesthesia,Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences,Ranchi
Deaprtment of Surgical Oncology, DR BRAIRCH,All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
Department of Superspeciality Anesthesia, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi
Department of Radiation Oncology,Lady Hardinge Medical College & SSK Hospital, Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Delhi
Lung Cancer Chemotherapy Telemedicine Communication

Abstract

The whole world is affected due to pandemic caused by SARS Cov 2. Imposition of nationwide lockdown to curb viral transmission has impacted various healthcare services including cancer care services. Most important concern is the risk of exposure to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS CoV 2) and its effect on patients with cancer. Alteration in lung cancer care services including number of chemotherapy sessions, dosages of chemotherapy, number of radiotherapy fractions and duration, about maintenance therapy and immunotherapy etc., could maintain the continuity of care without affecting quality of cancer care. In this review, we have discussed challenges and counter measures for lung cancer management amidst COVID-19 pandemic.

Introduction

The new pandemic due to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS CoV 2) has impacted our lives in various ways. In addition, the lockdown has halted most of the healthcare services including cancer care. Healthcare service is primarily focussing on managing the crisis of COVID-19 pandemic rather than routine care. Considering the risk to patients and healthcare professionals, many cancer societies have advised to defer surgeries for tracheobronchial malignancies if alternative treatment is available as these surgeries carry higher risk of post operative morbidity and mortality in presence of COVID infection [1]. But still, patient expects answers to many of questions related to cancer care including effects of deferred or missed chemo-radiotherapy amid lockdown, need for follow up PET CT scan, laboratory investigations etc. At present, there is no universal and all time answer to these questions.

The cancer patients are susceptible to viral infections due to immunocompromised state. Infection like Influenza increases the risk of poor outcome in cancer patients [2]. Lymphopenia/Neutropenia can aggravate the risk in those who are on chemotherapy. Study from Wuhan reported 1% of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia had concomitant cancer, which was significant as compared to cancer incidences in the Chinese population [3]. In addition, transfer to the critical care unit required in 39% of cancer patients due to rapid worsening of illness (13 vs 43 days to worsening). Chemotherapy or surgery in last 1 month was also a significant risk factor (P=0.0026, OR 5.34) [3]. Most of the lung cancer patients are active smokers, older with concurrent respiratory problems like COPD, Asthma, ILD etc., and majority of them are on chronic inhaled or oral steroid/ immunosuppressant therapies. This increases the risk for poor outcomes in case of COVID-19 Pneumonia. During active cancer care, patients need to visit hospital frequently, to stay in hospital before and after surgery, for chemoradiotherapy, laboratory investigations and imaging. Frequent hospital visits are a potential risk factor for exposure to infection [4-5]. Therefore, an alternative policy is required in order to limit hospital visits for follow-up by strengthening the telemedicine facilities to avoid unnecessary exposure.

Challenges in Lung Cancer Care

Current challenge is to balance the risk of admission to the hospital with the possible risk of a corona virus exposure, which could have emotional impact on patients and medical staffs also [6]. Chemotherapy sessions, radiotherapy, palliative care, follow ups etc. have been significantly affected. Even diagnosis is delayed as bronchoscopy and other interventional procedure have been deferred. In addition, nationwide lockdown has restricted access to transport and flight services. Patients in rural parts are suffering significantly. Effect of all this on outcome of disease is creating anxiety and distress among patients. Limited availability of intensive care facilities because of COVID-19 patient’s needs has further put strain on care of such patients even if aggressive curative treatment in the form of surgical resection is required.

Psychological Impact

Knowledge of risk of exposure to virus and its effects deeply affects cancer patients. This includes fear of current healthcare functional status which could affect optimal treatment of cancer. Anxiety and distress are higher among cancer patients. Cancer patients can feel isolated and guilty if their family helps them with daily living activities, due to which social distancing norms are difficult to maintain [3-6]. Quarantine during pandemic, can cause depression, irritability and anxiety, if imposed for long periods [3-6]. Staying at home gives feeling of loneliness which could have negative impact on cancer patients [7-8]. The outcome is also affected due to uncertainty related to COVID-19 and cancer is also adding to emotional distress [9-10-11].

Altering Treatments and Guidelines

Several Lung cancer associations have issued guidelines on lung cancer care during the pandemic which include therapeutic intent and treatment benefits, considering the patient’s age, comorbidities, and patient preferences [12]. Some alteration in cancer care practice can limit the exposure to infection [13].

For small cell variant of lung cancer, 4 cycles of cisplatin and etoposide chemotherapy can be preferred instead of 6 cycles in stages I-III. Replacement of etposide from intravenous to oral form helps limit hospital visit. Possible effect on bioavailability with altered pharmacodynamics should be taken in account [14-15]. In stage I, surgical resection of the tumor, followed by chemotherapy can be considered. Radiotherapy with accelerated hyperfractionation (two times a day) can limit the hospital visits. For stage IV patients, in selected cases, palliative chemotherapy with platinum and etoposide can be considered along with other supportive care. For febrile neutropenic patients, dose reduction in chemotherapy can be considered with supplemental GM-CSF therapy.

Immune check point inhibitor (durvalumab/atezolizumab) can be omitted, considering tri-weekly clinic visit during maintenance phase [16].

In non-small cell variant of lung cancer, for small tumors having stable growth, surgery can be delayed with follow up Computed Tomography (CT) of chest. Patients with restricted pulmonary reserve or multiple comorbidities, stereotactic radiotherapy is an alternative. Minimal invasive approaches are preferred to limit hospital stay. Post-Surgery chemotherapy can lead to 5% increment in 5-year survival in stage II, III and in some cases of stage IB. Older patients with multiple comorbidities having poor performance score (≥2); risk of complications from adjuvant chemotherapy should be taken in consideration. Adjuvant chemotherapy can be omitted or stopped early preferably after 3 cycles [13]. Cisplatin and docetaxel regimen reduces frequent hospital admission and stay, as compared to vinorelbin or gemcitabine which require 8th day administration but having same efficacy. In non- squamous non-small cell variant, cisplatin and pemetrexed regimen is an efficacious alternative limiting the hospital visits [17-18]. For positive EGFR mutation, oral EGFR- TKI for 1 year on daily basis is preferred alternative. Small tumors having stable growth, curative radiotherapy can be delayed with follow up CT chest [13]. Durvalumab at every 4 weeks with a dose of 20 mg/kg is equally efficacious to every 2 weeks with dose of 10 mg/kg, limiting the hospital visits [14-19]. Asymptomatic patients having indolent disease, chemotherapy or immunotherapy could be delayed [14]. Chemotherapy, TKI or immune checkpoint inhibitors can cause pneumonitis mimicking COVID-19 pneumonia or interstitial lung disease. This should be addressed aggressively with appropriate investigations like chest CT and proper treatment. Three weekly chemotherapy is preferred over weekly regimens for docetaxel to reduce hospital visits [15]. Palliative chemotherapy can be restricted to 4 cycles. Maintenance therapy with pemetrexed can be omitted. Pembrolizumab as a first line monotherapy is preferred in those having PD- L1 more than 50% [13]. Nivolumab at every 4 weeks with dose of 480 mg is preferred which is equally efficacious to 240 mg every 2 weeks [13-20]. Leading edge care practice should be discussed with all patients to avoid hospital admission [14]. Do Not Resuscitate’ stance should be discussed for all stage 4 patients who are not amenable for chemoradiotherapy. Self-administration of Enoxaparin or Denosumab should be taught to the patients [14].

For malignant pleural mesothelioma variant, decortication or extended pleura removal followed by chemotherapy can be considered in medically fit early stage disease. In cases with having performance score of 0-1, 4 cycles of platin and pemetrexed chemotherapy are preferred. Extra care should be taken while considering palliative chemotherapy in older patients with multiple comorbidities and poor performance score (≥2). In asymptomatic patients, chemo radio therapy can be delayed. An indwelling pleural catheter is preferred in recurrent malignant pleural effusion [13].

Patient Needs during Crisis

Ensuring safety of the patients with effective care is most important. The stress, anxiety and fear of disease progression due to treatment interruption are constant cause of psychological distress in lung cancer patients. Counseling by treating physician and measures like being physically active, taking healthy and balanced diet and maintaining good sleep can alleviate the distressing symptoms. Other important measures include peaceful mind strategies, social connectivity and avoiding misleading information. Virtual meetings of societies and cancer support groups are other sources of encouragement and mental support during pandemic [21].

Communication Services during Crisis

In current pandemic situation, efficient and meaningful communication between physician and Cancer patients is very important. Telemedicine is an efficient way of communication with positive reviews [22-23]. Avoidance of nonessential admissions to hospital can be achieved by interacting with patients via telemedicine and giving them advices on different aspects of cancer care [24]. Various hospitals and cancer institute’s website have provided regular updated information on COVID-19. A social media platform is an another way to reach out to cancer patients. Online cancer support group experienced higher self efficacy about health, functional and emotional well-being with positive impact on psychosocial health outcomes [25]. Tweet chats have reported to decrease anxiety among cancer patients [26]. Virtual tools, like webinars, videoconferencing etc. are also helpful to provide support during pandemic. The need of virtual care during the pandemic through further research will help to understand its effect on cancer care.

In conclusion, in India, Nationwide lockdown to control the transmission of coronavirus infection have significantly impacted cancer care. In the absence of treatment, tumor growth with or without spread and development of resistance to anti-cancer drugs, can add to the complications including death. It is necessary to create a policy for cancer care during COVID-19 crisis with strategies to limit hospital visits including stay in hospital and to promote online care. There is a need to enhance the communication with patients and caregivers through digital platforms, to empower them [27]. Palliative and supportive care for advanced cancer patients during the outbreak should be enhanced by schematically identifying the critical areas of needs, available resources in terms of infrastructure and manpower in resource-constrained settings.

References

References

  1. ASCO Special Report: Guide to Cancer Care Delivery during the COVID-19 Pandemic. https://www.asco.org/sites/new-www.asco.org/files/content-files/2020-ASCO-Guide-Cancer-COVID19.pdf (Accessed on May 20, 2020). 2020.
  2. Bitterman Roni, Eliakim-Raz Noa, Vinograd Inbal, Zalmanovici Trestioreanu Anca, Leibovici Leonard, Paul Mical. Influenza vaccines in immunosuppressed adults with cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2018. DOI
  3. Liang Wenhua, Guan Weijie, Chen Ruchong, Wang Wei, Li Jianfu, Xu Ke, Li Caichen, Ai Qing, Lu Weixiang, Liang Hengrui, Li Shiyue, He Jianxing. Cancer patients in SARS-CoV-2 infection: a nationwide analysis in China. The Lancet Oncology. 2020; 21(3)DOI
  4. Shankar Abhishek, Saini Deepak, Bhandari Ruchir, Bharati Sachidanand Jee, Kumar Sunil, Yadav Geetika, Durga Tarun, Goyal Nalin. Lung cancer management challenges amidst COVID-19 pandemic: hope lives here. Lung Cancer Management. 2020; 9(3)DOI
  5. Ray Upasana, Aziz Faisal, Shankar Abhishek, Biswas Aalekhya Sharma, Chakraborty Abhijit. COVID-19: The Impact in Oncology Care. SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine. 2020; 2(12)DOI
  6. Brooks Samantha K, Webster Rebecca K, Smith Louise E, Woodland Lisa, Wessely Simon, Greenberg Neil, Rubin Gideon James. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. The Lancet. 2020; 395(10227)DOI
  7. D'Ippolito S., Shams M., Ambrosini E., Calì G., Pastorelli D.. The effect of loneliness on cancer mortality. Annals of Oncology. 2017; 28DOI
  8. Hill Erin M., Hamm Andriana. Intolerance of uncertainty, social support, and loneliness in relation to anxiety and depressive symptoms among women diagnosed with ovarian cancer. Psycho-Oncology. 2019; 28(3)DOI
  9. Bortolato Beatrice, Hyphantis Thomas N., Valpione Sara, Perini Giulia, Maes Michael, Morris Gerwyn, Kubera Marta, Köhler Cristiano A., Fernandes Brisa S., Stubbs Brendon, Pavlidis Nicholas, Carvalho André F.. Depression in cancer: The many biobehavioral pathways driving tumor progression. Cancer Treatment Reviews. 2017; 52DOI
  10. Reis Joaquim C., Antoni Michael H., Travado Luzia. Emotional distress, brain functioning, and biobehavioral processes in cancer patients: a neuroimaging review and future directions. CNS Spectrums. 2019; 25(1)DOI
  11. Papanastasiou Artemis, Seliniotaki Theodora, Rizos Emmanouil, Kampoli Katerina, Ntavatzikos Anastasios, Arkadopoulos Nikolaos, Tsionou Christina, Spandidos Demetrios, Koumarianou Anna. Role of stress, age and adjuvant therapy in the cognitive function of patients with breast cancer (Review). Oncology Letters. 2019. DOI
  12. Hanna Timothy P., Evans Gerald A., Booth Christopher M.. Cancer, COVID-19 and the precautionary principle: prioritizing treatment during a global pandemic. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology. 2020; 17(5)DOI
  13. British Thoracic Society. Lung cancer and mesothelioma service guidance during the COVID‐19 pandemic. https://www.brit-thoracic.org.uk/about-us/covid-19-information-for-the-respiratory-community/; last accessed on April 4, 2020.
  14. Haut Conseil de la Santé publique. COVID-19 et Cancers Solides: Recommandations. https://www.hcsp.fr/Explore.cgi/avisrapportsdomaine?clefr=776; last accessed on April 4, 2020.
  15. Clark Peter I., Slevin Maurice L.. The Clinical Pharmacology of Etoposide and Teniposide. Clinical Pharmacokinetics. 1987; 12(4)DOI
  16. Klastersky J., de Naurois J., Rolston K., Rapoport B., Maschmeyer G., Aapro M., Herrstedt J.. Management of febrile neutropaenia: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines. Annals of Oncology. 2016; 27DOI
  17. Wakelee Heather A, Dahlberg Suzanne E, Keller Steven M, Tester William J, Gandara David R, Graziano Stephen L, Adjei Alex A, Leighl Natasha B, Aisner Seena C, Rothman Jan M, Patel Jyoti D, Sborov Mark D, McDermott Sean R, Perez-Soler Roman, Traynor Anne M, Butts Charles, Evans Tracey, Shafqat Atif, Chapman Andrew E, Kasbari Samer S, Horn Leora, Ramalingam Suresh S, Schiller Joan H. Adjuvant chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab in patients with resected non-small-cell lung cancer (E1505): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial. The Lancet Oncology. 2017; 18(12)DOI
  18. Senan Suresh, Brade Anthony, Wang Lu-hua, Vansteenkiste Johan, Dakhil Shaker, Biesma Bonne, Martinez Aguillo Maite, Aerts Joachim, Govindan Ramaswamy, Rubio-Viqueira Belén, Lewanski Conrad, Gandara David, Choy Hak, Mok Tony, Hossain Anwar, Iscoe Neill, Treat Joseph, Koustenis Andrew, San Antonio Bélen, Chouaki Nadia, Vokes Everett. PROCLAIM: Randomized Phase III Trial of Pemetrexed-Cisplatin or Etoposide-Cisplatin Plus Thoracic Radiation Therapy Followed by Consolidation Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Nonsquamous Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2016; 34(9)DOI
  19. Antonia Scott, Goldberg Sarah B, Balmanoukian Ani, Chaft Jamie E, Sanborn Rachel E, Gupta Ashok, Narwal Rajesh, Steele Keith, Gu Yu, Karakunnel Joyson J, Rizvi Naiyer A. Safety and antitumour activity of durvalumab plus tremelimumab in non-small cell lung cancer: a multicentre, phase 1b study. The Lancet Oncology. 2016; 17(3)DOI
  20. Garon EB, Reinmuth N, Falchero L, et al. CheckMate 384: Phase IIIb/IV trial of nivolumab (nivo) 480 mg Q4W versus 240 mg Q2W after ≤ 12 months of nivo in previously treated advanced NSCLC. ASCO-SITC Clinical Immuno-Oncology Symposium 2019; abstract 100.
  21. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Stress and Coping. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). https://www. cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019‑ncov/daily‑life‑coping/managingstress‑anxiety. html. Accessed April 28, 2020.
  22. Gondal H., Choquette H., Abbas T., Le D., Chalchal H.I., Iqbal N., Ahmed S.. Patients and physicians’ satisfaction with telemedicine (TM) in cancer care and factors that correlate with a positive patient’s experience. Annals of Oncology. 2019; 30DOI
  23. Sirintrapun S. Joseph, Lopez Ana Maria. Telemedicine in Cancer Care. American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book. 2018; 38DOI
  24. Cinar Pelin, Kubal Timothy, Freifeld Alison, Mishra Asmita, Shulman Lawrence, Bachman James, Fonseca Rafael, Uronis Hope, Klemanski Dori, Slusser Kim, Lunning Matthew, Liu Catherine. Safety at the Time of the COVID-19 Pandemic: How to Keep Our Oncology Patients and Healthcare Workers Safe. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. 2020; 18(5)DOI
  25. Attai Deanna J, Cowher Michael S, Al-Hamadani Mohammed, Schoger Jody M, Staley Alicia C, Landercasper Jeffrey. Twitter Social Media is an Effective Tool for Breast Cancer Patient Education and Support: Patient-Reported Outcomes by Survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2015; 17(7)DOI
  26. Shim Minsun, Cappella Joseph N., Han Jeong Yeob. How Does Insightful and Emotional Disclosure Bring Potential Health Benefits? Study Based on Online Support Groups for Women With Breast Cancer. Journal of Communication. 2011; 61(3)DOI
  27. Shankar Abhishek, Saini Deepak, Roy Shubham, Mosavi Jarrahi Alireza, Chakraborty Abhijit, Bharti Sachidanand Jee, Taghizadeh-Hesary Farzad. Cancer Care Delivery Challenges Amidst Coronavirus Disease – 19 (COVID-19) Outbreak: Specific Precautions for Cancer Patients and Cancer Care Providers to Prevent Spread. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention. 2020; 21(3)DOI